Literature DB >> 9254155

[An evaluation of the protocols of the CME program. Do they satisfy the criteria for the working out of clinical protocols?].

M Leal Hernández1, J Saura Llamas, P Saturno Hernández.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protocols published in the journal Formación Médica Continuada (FMC) since its appearance.
DESIGN: An evaluation study.
SETTING: The journal FMC in Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical protocols (11) published by the journal, and the people who have composed them.
INTERVENTIONS: An evaluation based on the criteria for composing clinical protocols proposed by Saura et al. MAIN
RESULTS: Overall these proposals complied with 56.9% of the proposed criteria. None of them (0%) complied with all the norms that a protocol must meet. On analysing independently each criterion, the following were satisfied in all the protocols evaluated: the designation, index of pages, definition of the problem and bibliography. The protocol for COPE in Primary Care satisfied 75% of the criteria and was the protocol which complied with most criteria. The battered child protocol satisfied 41.66% of the criteria and was the protocol satisfying the least number of criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: These are good protocols, in that overall they satisfy a large part of the proposed criteria, despite the fact that these are demanding criteria. However they can and must improve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9254155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  1 in total

1.  [Factors linked to structural quality in the guidelines for clinical practice of physiotherapy].

Authors:  F Medina Mirapeix; P J Saturno Hernández; A B Meseguer Henarejos; J Montilla Herrador; J Saura Llamas; J J Gascón Cánovas
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.