BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many therapies have been tried in primary biliary cirrhosis. It has been suggested that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate may offer advantages. Because the benefit and safety of this combination is uncertain, we conducted this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. METHODS:Twenty-five patients with well-defined primary biliary cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day) plus methotrexate (10 mg/week) or ursodeoxycholic acid plus placebo for a period of 48 weeks. Clinical, biochemical and histologic evolution were assessed. RESULTS: In both groups the clinical response was similar and heterogeneous. In patients of ursodeoxycholic acid alone group, biochemical and histologic changes were comparable to those of patients of ursodeoxycholic acid plus methotrexate at 48 weeks. The addition of methotrexate was not associated with substantial adverse affects. CONCLUSIONS: The use of methotrexate in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid was not followed by an additive benefit over ursodeoxycholic acid alone, nor was substantial toxicity added. Unless larger and longer controlled trials with clinical, biochemical and histologic controls show it to be a safe and effective therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid+methotrexate should not be used as a proven and accepted treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many therapies have been tried in primary biliary cirrhosis. It has been suggested that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate may offer advantages. Because the benefit and safety of this combination is uncertain, we conducted this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with well-defined primary biliary cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day) plus methotrexate (10 mg/week) or ursodeoxycholic acid plus placebo for a period of 48 weeks. Clinical, biochemical and histologic evolution were assessed. RESULTS: In both groups the clinical response was similar and heterogeneous. In patients of ursodeoxycholic acid alone group, biochemical and histologic changes were comparable to those of patients of ursodeoxycholic acid plus methotrexate at 48 weeks. The addition of methotrexate was not associated with substantial adverse affects. CONCLUSIONS: The use of methotrexate in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid was not followed by an additive benefit over ursodeoxycholic acid alone, nor was substantial toxicity added. Unless larger and longer controlled trials with clinical, biochemical and histologic controls show it to be a safe and effective therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid+methotrexate should not be used as a proven and accepted treatment.
Authors: Jennifer Y Lee; Christopher J Danford; Hirsh D Trivedi; Elliot B Tapper; Vilas R Patwardhan; Alan Bonder Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Andrea Crosignani; Pier-Maria Battezzati; Pietro Invernizzi; Carlo Selmi; Elena Prina; Mauro Podda Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742