Literature DB >> 9251988

The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens.

K S Vestergaard1, E Skadhauge, L G Lawson.   

Abstract

The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing was studied in small groups of laying hens. The birds were reared and kept for 2.5 years in cages with either sand ("sand birds") or wire floors ("wire birds"), and subsequently deprived of sand (sand birds) or given access to sand (wire birds). Before this change, wire birds had a higher incidence of unilateral wing/leg stretching and stereotypic pecking compared to sand birds; however, there was no difference in corticosterone concentrations. Deprivation of sand in the sand birds resulted in a total absence of dustbathing and in a significant increase in corticosterone concentrations. Although the wire birds dustbathed on the wire before the change of floors, there was a significant increase in the incidence of dustbathing after sand was provided, but no changes in the concentrations of corticosterone. Threats and allopecks decreased in the wire birds after access to sand, whereas no changes were found in the sand birds. Stereotypic pecks on feathers were absent in the sand birds, but were frequent in most of the wire birds both before and after they were given sand. Also, in the wire birds, all feather pecking (stereotypic and nonstereotypic) was positively correlated with the concentration of corticosterone, and this kind of pecking may, thus, be an expression of stress in laying hens. We conclude that the nonperformance of dustbathing behavior is associated with the experience of stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9251988     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00041-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

1.  An Exploration Based Cognitive Bias Test for Mice: Effects of Handling Method and Stereotypic Behaviour.

Authors:  Janja Novak; Jeremy D Bailoo; Luca Melotti; Jonas Rommen; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Animal Welfare and Food Safety Aspects of Confining Broiler Chickens to Cages.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Michael Greger
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Generalized Unsafety Theory of Stress: Unsafe Environments and Conditions, and the Default Stress Response.

Authors:  Jos F Brosschot; Bart Verkuil; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Farm Environmental Enrichments Improve the Welfare of Layer Chicks and Pullets: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Gang Shu; Yanting Liu; Pingwu Qin; Yilei Zheng; Yaofu Tian; Xiaoling Zhao; Xiaohui Du
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Dust-bathing behavior of laying hens in enriched colony housing systems and an aviary system.

Authors:  H Louton; S Bergmann; S Reese; M H Erhard; E Rauch
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.