Literature DB >> 9250644

Domestic violence in an inner-city ED.

A A Ernst1, T G Nick, S J Weiss, D Houry, T Mills.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of domestic violence (DV) for male and female ED patients and to determine the demographics of DV.
METHODS: The study design was a descriptive written survey of adults. We used the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA), a previously validated survey tool. The study was set in an inner-city ED with approximately 75,000 patients annually, most of them indigent. Patients 18 years or older who were able to give consent were included. Patients were excluded if they had a language barrier, were a prisoner, or had never had a partner. All patients presenting during 31 randomly selected 4-hour shifts during July 1995 were considered for the study. DV was defined as either physical or nonphysical on the basis of ISA scoring. The prevalence was determined for present (in the preceding year) and past (more than 1 year ago) abuse. Four violence parameters were calculated for patients who had a partner at the time of presentation: present physical, present nonphysical, past physical, and past nonphysical. Only the "past" parameters were calculated for patients who had had a partner in the past but had no partner at the time of presentation. We used the chi2 test to determine individually significant predictors of the four parameters. Logistic-regression models were constructed to determine the significant predictors of DV. Associations among the present physical, present nonphysical, past physical, and past nonphysical abuse categories were determined with McNemar's test.
RESULTS: We enrolled 516 patients, 233 men and 283 women. On the basis of ISA scoring, 14% of men and 22% of women had experienced past nonphysical violence (P=.02, men versus women), and 28% of men and 33% of women had experienced past physical violence (P=.35). Of the 157 men and 207 women with partners at the time of presentation, 11% of men and 15% of women reported present nonphysical violence (P=.20), and 20% men and 19% of women reported present physical violence (P=.71). Using logistic-regression models, we determined that women experienced significantly more past and present nonphysical violence but not physical violence than men. For all four parameters, the victim's suicidal ideation and alcohol use were independently associated with DV. The victim's family history was strongly associated with past abuse. Using McNemar's test, we found that physical and nonphysical abuse were correlated in the past and present.
CONCLUSION: Using a validated scale, we found that the prevalences of physical DV for men and women are high and that they are not statistically different in this population. Using chi 2 testing, we found that women had experienced significantly more past nonphysical violence than men; using logistic regression we found that they experienced significantly more nonphysical violence (both past and present) than men. DV was frequently associated with suicidal ideation, alcohol use, and family history of violence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Crime; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Domestic Violence; Examinations And Diagnoses; Health; Health Facilities; Hospitals; North America; Northern America; Physical Examinations And Diagnoses; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Social Problems; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9250644     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70141-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  20 in total

1.  [Care of victims of domestic violence in the emergency unit of a health centre].

Authors:  Rosmary Argüelles Vázquez; Patricia Lorente Montalvo; Magdalena Esteva Cantó
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  The Voices of survivors documentary: using patient narrative to educate physicians about domestic violence.

Authors:  Christina Nicolaidis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Utility of STaT for the identification of recent intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Anuradha Paranjape; Kimberly Rask; Jane Liebschutz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Does the health status of intimate partner violence victims warrant pharmacies as portals for public health promotion?

Authors:  Catherine Cerulli; Jennifer Cerulli; Elizabeth J Santos; Najii Lu; Hua He; Kimberly Kaukeinen; Anne Marie White; Xin Tu
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr 1

5.  Differences in female and male victims and perpetrators of partner violence with respect to WEB scores.

Authors:  Debra Houry; Karin V Rhodes; Robin S Kemball; Lorie Click; Catherine Cerulli; Louise Anne McNutt; Nadine J Kaslow
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2008-02-13

6.  The role of race/ethnicity in the relationship between emergency department use and intimate partner violence: findings from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Authors:  Sherry Lipsky; Raul Caetano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Intimate partner violence and comorbid mental health conditions among urban male patients.

Authors:  Karin V Rhodes; Debra Houry; Catherine Cerulli; Helen Straus; Nadine J Kaslow; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 8.  Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: a review and introduction of pilot guidelines.

Authors:  Leigh S Kimberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Childhood family violence and perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence: findings from a national population-based study of couples.

Authors:  Christy M McKinney; Raul Caetano; Suhasini Ramisetty-Mikler; Scott Nelson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Abused women disclose partner interference with health care: an unrecognized form of battering.

Authors:  Laura A McCloskey; Corrine M Williams; Erika Lichter; Megan Gerber; Michael L Ganz; Robert Sege
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.