Literature DB >> 9250503

Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system.

Y Hyun1, M Ellis, F K McKeith, E R Wilson.   

Abstract

The feed intake pattern and growth performance of boars, barrows, and gilts fed diets differing in lysine and protein content were measured on 120 crossbred pigs from 27 (SD 3.7) to 81.5 (SD 9.2) kg live weight. The pigs were housed in eight mixed-sex groups with five pigs of each sex in each group. They were fed from an electronic feed station that recorded individual meal sizes and the time and duration of visits to the feeder for each animal in the group. Four dietary treatments were compared. During the grower period (27 to 55 kg), diets ranged in lysine content form .98 to 1.31%; for the remainder of the study, lysine content was .88 to 1.18%. Barrows had a greater (P < .01) number of meals per day than the other two sexes (7.4 vs 7.0 vs 7.0 +/- .10, respectively), but there were no significant differences among sexes for daily feed intake or other feed intake traits. Daily feed intake increased with dietary lysine content, largely because of increased meal sizes resulting from longer feeder occupation times at each visit. Visits to the feeder were greatest between 0900 and 1100 and lowest between 2000 and 0400. Correlations between feeding pattern and growth traits were relatively low. Repeatabilities of feeding pattern traits were generally higher when measured over shorter time periods. These results suggest a change in feeding behavior with increasing dietary lysine levels and a relatively small effect of sex on feeding pattern for mixed-sex groups of 15 pigs fed from a single electronic feed station.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9250503     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7561443x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in feeding behavior in rats: the relationship with neuronal activation in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Atsushi Fukushima; Hiroko Hagiwara; Hitomi Fujioka; Fukuko Kimura; Tatsuo Akema; Toshiya Funabashi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Pigs Ferment Enzymatically Digestible Starch when it Is Substituted for Resistant Starch.

Authors:  Rik J J van Erp; Sonja de Vries; Theo A T G van Kempen; Walter J J Gerrits
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  A New Approach to Detecting and Measuring Changes in the Feeding Behaviour Habits of Group-Housed Growing-Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  Marta Fornós; Mercè Farré; Sergi López-Vergé; Encarnación Jiménez-Moreno; Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez; Josep Gasa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Genome-wide association of changes in swine feeding behaviour due to heat stress.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Brittney N Keel; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Joseph P Cassady; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  The influence of feeding behaviour on growth performance, carcass and meat characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carcò; Luigi Gallo; Mirco Dalla Bona; Maria Angeles Latorre; Manuel Fondevila; Stefano Schiavon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Fasting Finisher Pigs before Slaughter Influences Pork Safety, Pork Quality and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Bert Driessen; Louis Freson; Johan Buyse
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Plasticity of feeding behaviour traits in response to production environment (temperate vs. tropical) in group-housed growing pigs.

Authors:  Nausicaa Poullet; Wendy M Rauw; David Renaudeau; Juliette Riquet; Mario Giorgi; Yvon Billon; Hélène Gilbert; Jean-Luc Gourdine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genetic selection modulates feeding behavior of group-housed pigs exposed to daily cyclic high ambient temperatures.

Authors:  Alícia Zem Fraga; Luciano Hauschild; Paulo Henrique Reis Furtado Campos; Marcio Valk; Débora Zava Bello; Marcos Kipper; Ines Andretta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A QTL affecting daily feed intake maps to Chromosome 2 in pigs.

Authors:  Ross D Houston; Chris S Haley; Alan L Archibald; Kellie A Rance
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Feeding behaviour of artificially reared Romane lambs.

Authors:  I David; F Bouvier; E Ricard; J Ruesche; J-L Weisbecker
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.