Literature DB >> 9249107

Studies on the safety of glucose and paraben-containing neostigmine for intrathecal administration.

M S Gurun1, R Leinbach, L Moore, C S Lee, M D Owen, J C Eisenach.   

Abstract

Initial toxicity testing of neostigmine for intrathecal (IT) injection was performed with preservative-free isobaric solution, yet currently available formulations contain the preservatives methyl- and propylparaben and are usually mixed with glucose to yield hyperbaric solutions. Since it has been proposed that preservatives and hyperbaricity increase the risk of neurotoxicity after IT injection, we examined the safety of chronically administered IT neostigmine containing these additives in sheep and rats. Rats receiving daily IT injections of glucose alone or of glucose with preservative-containing neostigmine, 5 and 10 microg, exhibited dose-related antinociception, tremor, and rigidity. In comparison to our previously published study of neostigmine injection in solution without glucose, rats receiving IT neostigmine with glucose displayed less rigidity, tremor, and salivation. Sheep receiving daily injection of glucose alone or with preservative-containing neostigmine, 1 mg, for 14 days exhibited no histologic evidence of neurotoxicity, nor did they exhibit abnormalities in cerebrospinal fluid chemistry aside from those caused by inflammation. Spinal cord histologic examination in both species revealed fibrosis and inflammation secondary to the catheter without evidence of neuronal damage. These studies support the safety of paraben- and glucose-containing IT neostigmine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9249107     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199708000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  Safety of intrathecal route: focus to methylprednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol) use.

Authors:  Joël Schlatter; David Nguyen; Michèle Zamy; Sofiane Kabiche; Jean-Eudes Fontan; Salvatore Cisternino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of the neurological safety of epidurally-administered pregabalin in rats.

Authors:  Jeong Rim Lee; Pyung-Bok Lee; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Chul Lee; Hyo Min Lee; Eunjung Kim; Yong Chul Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-01-25

Review 3.  The evolution of spinal/epidural neostigmine in clinical application: Thoughts after two decades.

Authors:  Gabriela Rocha Lauretti
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01

4.  A comparison of dexamethasone and clonidine as an adjuvant for caudal blocks in pediatric urogenital surgeries.

Authors:  Chandni Sinha; Bindey Kumar; Umesh Kumar Bhadani; Ajeet Kumar; Amarjeet Kumar; Alok Ranjan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Dec

Review 5.  The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration.

Authors:  Henning Hermanns; Elke M E Bos; Mark L van Zuylen; Markus W Hollmann; Markus F Stevens
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.497

6.  Evaluation of the neurological safety of epidural milnacipran in rats.

Authors:  Seung Mo Lim; Mee Ran Shin; Kyung Ho Kang; Hyun Kang; Francis Sahngun Nahm; Baek Hui Kim; Hwa Yong Shin; Young Jin Lim; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2012-10-04

7.  Perspectives in ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventions.

Authors:  Aditya Ravindra Daftary; Alpana Sudhir Karnik
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.