Literature DB >> 924794

Disclosure and informed-consent: does it matter how we tell it?

R R Faden.   

Abstract

Traditionally, informed consent has been handled by the physician in a one-to-one interchange with the patient. As standards for adequate disclosure become more rigid and demands on physician time increase, however, the physician-patient model may cease to be practical. This study evaluated four alterative disclosure models: a formal discussion, a videotape, a pamphlet, and an informal discussion, each designed and executed by a team of health educators. Study results suggest that the informed consent process is little affected by disclosure medium and that it may be possible to strive for cost-efficiency in disclosure without compromising the quality of the consent obtained. Based on these results, a two-part disclosure process is proposed which allocates certain aspects of the disclosure to the treating physician, others to health education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 924794     DOI: 10.1177/109019817700500302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Monogr        ISSN: 0073-1455


  2 in total

1.  Decision-making and informed consent: a study of the impact of disclosed information.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Tom L Beauchamp
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  1980-01

2.  How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  C H Braddock; S D Fihn; W Levinson; A R Jonsen; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.