Literature DB >> 9246522

Secondary craniofacial problems following skull base surgery.

S P Beals1, E F Joganic, T C Holcombe, R F Spetzler.   

Abstract

Skull base wounds remain the most challenging that a skull base surgeon faces because of the unique and unforgiving requirements of the intracranial compartment. To successfully reconstruct these defects after complex exposure and radical resection around vital structures, a most conservative approach must be taken (i.e., one must choose the option that has the greatest chance to be successful, even if it means taking the extra time and effort of doing a free tissue transfer). Indeed, one can take no short cuts if the skull base would be left with a tenuous repair. Close postoperative surveillance of the patient for complications and maximal medical management is essential. Because of the difficulty of examining the hidden skull base wound postoperatively, surgeons must have a low threshold for re-exploration if a complication is suspected. As the first decade of the multidisciplinary skull base team approach passes, and long-term results are being assessed, the question of "is it worth it?" is fair. The reported series are showing increased survival rates and decreased complication rates. Therefore, the answer would appear to be "yes". The question is best answered, however, by the individual patient who previously had no hope for treatment of his or her deep-seated skull base tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9246522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  2 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of extensions of transbasal approaches: effect on access to midline and paramedian structures.

Authors:  Pakrit Jittapiromsak; Anhua Wu; Pushpa Deshmukh; Iman Feiz-Erfan; Peter Nakaji; Robert F Spetzler; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-11

2.  A simple classification of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating tumors that facilitate choice of surgical approaches: analysis of a series of 32 cases.

Authors:  Yue-Fei Deng; Bing-Xi Lei; Mei-Guang Zheng; Yi-Qing Zheng; Wei-Liang Chen; Yu-Qing Lan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.