Literature DB >> 9244102

Length of transplanted small bowel required for adequate weight gain in rats.

K Takano1, J B Atkinson, J de Csepel, M Nio, M Kosi, D W Thomas, Y Tada.   

Abstract

Progress has been made toward developing a clinically successful small-bowel transplant procedure, but there has been little research concerning the functional aspects of the transplanted small bowel. Using a rat model, our study examined the length of transplanted small bowel required to provide adequate weight gain. The rats were divided into six groups; groups 1 and 2 were considered controls. Group 1 (n = 6) underwent a gastrostomy. Group 2 (n = 3) underwent a jejunoile-ectomy followed by re-establishment of intestinal continuity and anastomosis of the native proximal small bowel to an abdominal stoma and the distal portion to the ascending colon. Groups 3 (n = 5), 4 (n = 4), 5 (n = 5), and 6 (n = 4) underwent small-bowel transplantation, receiving 100%, 50%, 25%, and 15% transplants, respectively. The donor small-bowel anastomoses were the same as the native small-bowel anastomoses in group 2. All of the rats began to produce stool within 4 days of becoming dependent upon the transplanted small bowel. By the end of postoperative week 4, there was no significant difference between the percentages of preoperative body weight in groups 1-4 (range 125.7%-130.0%). Although the weight gain in group 5 was significantly less than that in groups 1-4 (P < 0.05), it was adequate (111.8%); group 6 animals lost weight (94.7%). It is concluded that a 50% or more small-bowel transplant with or without an ileocecal valve provides ample weight gain; minimally adequate weight gain is achieved by a 25% transplant without an ileocecal valve; and the graft begins to function soon after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244102     DOI: 10.1007/bf01076942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  32 in total

Review 1.  Indications and need for long-term parenteral nutrition: implications for intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Intestinal transplantation: current status.

Authors:  D Grant
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Successful small intestine transplantation.

Authors:  V McAlister; W Wall; C Ghent; R Zhong; J Duff; D Grant
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Effects of ileal and caecal resection on the colon of the rat.

Authors:  J H Scarpello; B A Cary; G E Sladen
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med       Date:  1978-03

5.  Orthotopic small intestine transplantation in the rat--how long a small intestinal graft is necessary?

Authors:  K Oki; K Maeda; K Nakamura
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Transplantation milestones. Viewed with one- and two-way paradigms of tolerance.

Authors:  T E Starzl; A J Demetris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  R L Kirkman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Small-bowel transplantation permits survival in rats with lethal short-gut syndrome.

Authors:  R E Sonnino; D H Teitelbaum; D J Dunaway; R P Harmel
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Small intestinal transplantation using cyclosporine. Report of a case.

Authors:  Z Cohen; R E Silverman; R Wassef; G A Levy; M Burnstein; J Cullen; L Makowka; B Langer; G R Greenberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Successful small-bowel/liver transplantation.

Authors:  D Grant; W Wall; R Mimeault; R Zhong; C Ghent; B Garcia; C Stiller; J Duff
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.