Literature DB >> 9244068

Surgery for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a Liverpool experience.

A N Kingsnorth1.   

Abstract

The development of a single-surgeon specialist referral practice for pancreatic surgery which evolved over an 8 year period is described. Source of referral, protocol for patient management, and operative strategy are outlined. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic sphincterotomy, and stent placement where possible (85% of cases), high-resolution contrast-enhanced CT and standard pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with a unique reconstructive technique were employed. In 105 patients receiving curative resection for pancreatic or periampullary tumours, the overall operative mortality was 4.8% and overall morbidity 26%. Actuarial 5-year survival rates were 11% for pancreatic carcinoma and 34% for ampullary carcinoma. Resectability rate was 81% without the use of time-consuming and expensive imaging techniques for staging such as laparoscopy, intraoperative ultrasound or laparoscopic ultrasound. No specific regimen of perioperative chemoirradiation was utilised over the study period. To achieve comparable results it is recommended that patients should be referred to regional specialist surgeons in whose hands mortality and morbidity is low, costs reduced and training of pancreatic surgeons can be undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244068      PMCID: PMC2502837     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  38 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A L Warshaw; C Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Current management of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Controversial issues in the management of pancreatic cancer: Part Two. A debate held at St Mary's Hospital, London on 18 November 1993.

Authors:  G Glazer; C Coulter; M E Crofton; W M Gedroyc; C D Johnson; C N Mallinson; R C Russell; M L Steer; J A Summerfield; R C Williamson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The role of selective visceral angiography in the management of pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  M Murugiah; J A Windsor; D N Redhead; J S O'Neill; B Suc; O J Garden; D C Carter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison between pylorus-preserving and Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  A Zerbi; G Balzano; R Patuzzo; G Calori; M Braga; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A novel reconstructive technique for pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: avoidance of early postoperative gastric stasis.

Authors:  A N Kingsnorth; J D Berg; M R Gray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Carcinoma of the pancreas: critical analysis of costs, results of resections, and the need for standardized reporting.

Authors:  B Gudjonsson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S G Marcus; H Cohen; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Is it an adequate cancer operation.

Authors:  J I Tsao; R L Rossi; J A Lowell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-04

10.  Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: histopathologic analysis of tumor spread in Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Tsukada; T Ohtani; S Koyama; T Muto; H Watanabe; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S P Povoski; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Nutritional risk index as an independent predictive factor for the development of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroji Shinkawa; Shigekazu Takemura; Takahiro Uenishi; Masayuki Sakae; Kazunori Ohata; Yorihisa Urata; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Akinori Nozawa; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Usefulness of follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Laurence Chiche; Barbara Alkofer; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Vincent Rouleau; Ephrem Salamé; Guy Samama; Philippe Segol
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.