Literature DB >> 9243588

The effects of nursing care guided by self-regulation theory on coping with radiation therapy.

J E Johnson1, V K Fieler, G S Wlasowicz, M L Mitchell, L S Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that preparatory informational interventions based on self-regulation theory delivered to radiation therapy (RT) recipients by staff nurses would reduce disruption in patients' usual life activities and have a positive effect on the moods of patients who tended to have pessimistic expectations about outcomes.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental design with repeated measures.
SETTING: University-affiliated RT department. SAMPLE: 226 patients receiving RT for breast or prostate cancer.
METHODS: The control-group patients received the nursing care that was the standard of practice before the experimental interventions were introduced. The experimental-group patients received theory-based interventions four different times from staff nurses. Patient data were collected by interview four different times. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Type of nursing interventions generated, optimistic or pessimistic expectations about outcomes (Life Orientation Test), amount of disruption in usual life activities (Sickness Impact Profile), and moods (Bi-Polar Profile of Mood States).
FINDINGS: The patients who received the self-regulation theory-based nursing interventions experienced less disruption in their usual life activities during and following RT. Among the patients who tended to be pessimistic, those who received the theory-based interventions had a more positive mood than those who did not receive the interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Staff nurses should use self-regulation theory-based interventions to help patients cope with RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Scott C Roesch; Linda Adams; Amanda Hines; Alan Palmores; Pearlin Vyas; Cindy Tran; Shannon Pekin; Allison A Vaughn
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-06

2.  Pain barriers: psychometrics of a 13-item questionnaire.

Authors:  Debra Boyd-Seale; Diana J Wilkie; Young Ok Kim; Marie L Suarez; Hilary Lee; Robert Molokie; Zhongsheng Zhao; Shiping Zong
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Factors associated with prostate cancer patients' and their spouses' satisfaction with a family-based intervention.

Authors:  Janet Harden; Margaret Falahee; Joan Bickes; Ann Schafenacker; Julie Walker; Darlene Mood; Laurel Northouse
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Relationships among optimism, well-being, self-transcendence, coping, and social support in women during treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellyn E Matthews; Paul F Cook
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sidney Bloch; Anthony Love; Michelle Macvean; Gill Duchesne; Jeremy Couper; David Kissane
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2007-01-10

6.  What makes the pregnant women revisit public hospitals for research? Participant engagement and retention trial in a public hospital (PERTH): an RCT protocol.

Authors:  Giridhara R Babu; Maithili Karthik; Deepa Ravi; Yamuna Ana; Prafulla Shriyan; Kiran Kumar Hasige; Keerti Deshpande; Lokesh Bangalore Siddlingaiah; Sanjay Kinra; Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.