Literature DB >> 9243473

Analysis of the dose-surface histogram and dose-wall histogram for the rectum and bladder.

S Li1, A Boyer, Y Lu, G T Chen.   

Abstract

Dose distribution throughout a hollow organ is represented by either a dose-surface histogram (DSH) or a dose-wall histogram (DWH). A spherical shell model for the bladder and a cylindrical shell model for the rectum were introduced for quantifying the difference between the DWH and DSH. The difference was given by subtraction of the percent volume of the wall from the percent area of the surface for any specific dose level. Taking the dose-grid size and contour-delineation uncertainties into account, the DSH and DWH calculation errors were estimated by simplified formulas. The DSHs and DWHs for the rectum and bladder in patients undergoing four-field-prostate treatment and gynecological intracavitary brachytherapy were computed with a refined numerical algorithm. Results of the analytic models and the numerical calculations demonstrated that the difference between the DWH and DSH was small (about 5%) for a fully filled bladder or rectum but large (about 10%) for an empty rectum or a contracted bladder. The error of DSH was about 3%, which is smaller than that of DWH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243473     DOI: 10.1118/1.598014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Dosimetric analysis and comparison of IMRT and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  V Murali; P G G Kurup; P Mahadev; S Mahalakshmi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-04

2.  Prospective clinical trial of bladder filling and three-dimensional dosimetry in high-dose-rate vaginal cuff brachytherapy.

Authors:  Alexandra J Stewart; Robert A Cormack; Hang Lee; Li Xiong; Jorgen L Hansen; Desmond A O'Farrell; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Distinct effects of rectum delineation methods in 3D-conformal vs. IMRT treatment planning of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Jürgen Meyer; Kurt Baier; Dirk Vordermark; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  The dosimetric effect of mixed-energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; Chang Heon Choi; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  The effect of photon energy on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Jong Min Park; Chang Heon Choi; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2012-03-31

6.  Difference in the rate of rectal complications following prostate brachytherapy based on the prostate-rectum distance and the prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Moon Hyung Kang; Young Dong Yu; Hyun Soo Shin; Jong Jin Oh; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.