Literature DB >> 9243440

A randomized trial of the impact of telephone and recorded delivery reminders on the response rate to research questionnaires.

S S Tai1, I Nazareth, A Haines, C Jowett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A range of factors have been shown to affect the response rate to mailed questionnaires, but particular strategies to improve patients' response in trials conducted in general practice require further study.
METHODS: Non-responders in a larger trial were randomized to receive a telephone or recorded delivery reminder on the third contact. The cost of administration of each method was estimated.
RESULTS: Significantly more patients returned completed questionnaires when sent questionnaires by recorded delivery, although the cost per patient contacted was nearly three times more than for contact by telephone.
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that sending reminders by recorded delivery, although more expensive, is more effective than telephone reminders for recruiting patients to a study in general practice using research questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243440     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  12 in total

1.  Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S S Tai; S Iliffe
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys.

Authors:  M Salim Silva; W T Smith; G Bammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Simon Gates; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomized trials developed from two consensus workshops.

Authors:  Valerie Brueton; Sally P Stenning; Fiona Stevenson; Jayne Tierney; Greta Rait
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 6.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03

7.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06

Review 8.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V C Brueton; J F Tierney; S Stenning; S Meredith; S Harding; I Nazareth; G Rait
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Use of strategies to improve retention in primary care randomised trials: a qualitative study with in-depth interviews.

Authors:  V C Brueton; F Stevenson; C L Vale; S P Stenning; J F Tierney; S Harding; I Nazareth; S Meredith; G Rait
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The impact of non-responders on health and lifestyle outcomes in an intervention study.

Authors:  Elsebeth Hansen; Kirsten Fonager; Kirsten S Freund; Jørgen Lous
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.