Literature DB >> 9243380

MR navigator-echo monitoring of temporal changes in diaphragm position: implications for MR coronary angiography.

A M Taylor1, P Jhooti, F Wiesmann, J Keegan, D N Firmin, D J Pennell.   

Abstract

Temporal changes in respiration could influence navigator-echo (NE)-gated MR coronary angiography (MRCA), but systematic investigation of the effects of such variations and how to limit them has not been performed. We addressed these issues by studying the influence of time in the magnet on diaphragm position and respiratory patterns using NE diaphragm monitoring in volunteers and a phantom model. NE diaphragm monitoring was performed at .5 T in 10 subjects over a total period of 35 minutes. The end-expiratory position was sustained for longer (1.1 vs .4 seconds, P < .001) and with greater position stability (SD 1.9 vs 5.9 mm, P = .01) than the end-inspiratory position. Drift of the end-expiratory position occurred over time, causing a fall in scan efficiency (44-28%, P = .01). Up-drift of the end-expiratory position was most common. Loss of scan efficiency was worse with up-drift because of loss of the end-expiratory pause from the NE window (up-drift 10% mm-1, down-drift 7% mm-1, both P = .03). Scan efficiency also was reduced during sleep (to a nadir of 0%), secondary to loss of the end-expiratory pause, periodic breathing with oscillating end-expiratory position, and periods of apnea. The phantom model used actual diaphragm traces to evaluate the artifact resulting from diaphragm motion during acquisition. Artifact was considerably reduced by NE adaptive motion correction compared with NE gating alone (ghosting ratio 2.0 vs 2.8, P < .01). Artifact also was significantly reduced with up-drift if scan efficiency was maintained above 35% (P = .05). For optimal NE-gated MRCA, the following features are important: the NE window should be placed around the end-expiratory position; subjects should not sleep; scan efficiency should be monitored and the NE window should be repositioned if scan efficiency falls below 35%; and adaptive motion correction should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243380     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  33 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries: clinical results from three dimensional evaluation of a respiratory gated technique.

Authors:  R J van Geuns; H G de Bruin; B J Rensing; P A Wielopolski; M D Hulshoff; P M van Ooijen; M Oudkerk; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A comparison of prospective and retrospective respiratory navigator gating in 3D MR coronary angiography.

Authors:  Y P Du; E R McVeigh; D A Bluemke; H A Silber; T K Foo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Prospective navigator gating with a dual acceptance window technique to reduce respiratory motion artifacts in 3D MR coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yiping P Du
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

Authors:  Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; Dwight G Nishimura; Bob S Hu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  MR imaging of the coronary vasculature: imaging the lumen, wall, and beyond.

Authors:  Kai Lin; James C Carr
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  3D motion adapted gating (3D MAG): a new navigator technique for accelerated acquisition of free breathing navigator gated 3D coronary MR-angiography.

Authors:  M Hackenbroch; K Nehrke; J Gieseke; C Meyer; K Tiemann; H Litt; O Dewald; C P Naehle; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary atherothrombosis.

Authors:  W Yong Kim; Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Warren J Manning; René M Botnar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sumeesh Dhawan; Kodlipet C Dharmashankar; Tahir Tak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-08

10.  GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.

Authors:  Ju Gang Nam; Jeong Min Lee; Hyo-Jin Kang; Sang Min Lee; Eunju Kim; Johannes M Peeters; Jeong Hee Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.