M Zaidi1, A Robert, R Fesler, C Derwael, C Brohet. 1. Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, University of Louvain Medical School, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Increased dispersion of ventricular repolarization has been shown to be a marker for increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in various cardiac disorders. The present study is aimed at comparing the values of four dispersion indices in four clinical groups: normal subjects (n = 23), patients with intraventricular conduction defects (QRS > 0.12 s) without underlying cardiac disease (n = 30), patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 36), and patients with both dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction defects (n = 18). METHODS: On an averaged cycle from a 10 s record of 15 simultaneous leads (12-lead ECG and XYZ leads), and after interactive editing, four intervals were computed: JTapex, JTend, QTapex and QTend. For each interval, the dispersion is defined as the difference between the maximal and minimal values across the 15 leads. RESULTS: The mean values of all four dispersion indices were significantly smaller in the normal group than in the three other groups (P < 0.001). Among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, those with intraventricular conduction defects had significantly higher dispersion values than those without, even disregarding the QRS duration (P < 0.01). Thus, patients with both dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction defects have larger dispersion values than patients with ventricular conduction defects alone (P < 0.01) and than those with dilated cardiomyopathy without intraventricular conduction defects. CONCLUSION: Dispersion of ventricular repolarization is increased in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, especially in those with ventricular conduction defects, suggesting that they are at higher risk of arrhythmic events.
OBJECTIVE: Increased dispersion of ventricular repolarization has been shown to be a marker for increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in various cardiac disorders. The present study is aimed at comparing the values of four dispersion indices in four clinical groups: normal subjects (n = 23), patients with intraventricular conduction defects (QRS > 0.12 s) without underlying cardiac disease (n = 30), patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 36), and patients with both dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction defects (n = 18). METHODS: On an averaged cycle from a 10 s record of 15 simultaneous leads (12-lead ECG and XYZ leads), and after interactive editing, four intervals were computed: JTapex, JTend, QTapex and QTend. For each interval, the dispersion is defined as the difference between the maximal and minimal values across the 15 leads. RESULTS: The mean values of all four dispersion indices were significantly smaller in the normal group than in the three other groups (P < 0.001). Among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, those with intraventricular conduction defects had significantly higher dispersion values than those without, even disregarding the QRS duration (P < 0.01). Thus, patients with both dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction defects have larger dispersion values than patients with ventricular conduction defects alone (P < 0.01) and than those with dilated cardiomyopathy without intraventricular conduction defects. CONCLUSION: Dispersion of ventricular repolarization is increased in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, especially in those with ventricular conduction defects, suggesting that they are at higher risk of arrhythmic events.
Authors: Ge Nigro; G Nigro; L Politano; L Santangelo; V R Petretta; L Passamano; F Panico; F De Luca; A Montefusco; L I Comi Journal: Heart Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Carlos Alberto Pastore; Sandra Regina Arcêncio; Nancy M M O Tobias; Elisabeth Kaiser; Martino Martinelli Filho; Luis Felipe P Moreira; Noedir A Stolf; Edimar Bocchi; José Antonio Franchini Ramires Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.468