Literature DB >> 9241418

Biomolecular dynamics at long timesteps: bridging the timescale gap between simulation and experimentation.

T Schlick1, E Barth, M Mandziuk.   

Abstract

Innovative algorithms have been developed during the past decade for simulating Newtonian physics for macromolecules. A major goal is alleviation of the severe requirement that the integration timestep be small enough to resolve the fastest components of the motion and thus guarantee numerical stability. This timestep problem is challenging if strictly faster methods with the same all-atom resolution at small timesteps are sought. Mathematical techniques that have worked well in other multiple-timescale contexts--where the fast motions are rapidly decaying or largely decoupled from others--have not been as successful for biomolecules, where vibrational coupling is strong. This review examines general issues that limit the timestep and describes available methods (constrained, reduced-variable, implicit, symplectic, multiple-timestep, and normal-mode-based schemes). A section compares results of selected integrators for a model dipeptide, assessing physical and numerical performance. Included is our dual timestep method LN, which relies on an approximate linearization of the equations of motion every delta t interval (5 fs or less), the solution of which is obtained by explicit integration at the inner timestep delta tau (e.g., 0.5 fs). LN is computationally competitive, providing 4-5 speedup factors, and results are in good agreement, in comparison to 0.5 fs trajectories. These collective algorithmic efforts help fill the gap between the time range that can be simulated and the timespans of major biological interest (milliseconds and longer). Still, only a hierarchy of models and methods, along with experimentational improvements, will ultimately give theoretical modeling the status of partner with experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9241418     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.26.1.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct        ISSN: 1056-8700


  14 in total

1.  Subtle but variable conformational rearrangements in the replication cycle of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4) may accommodate lesion bypass.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Karunesh Arora; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes?

Authors:  Paula Petrone; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Normal mode partitioning of Langevin dynamics for biomolecules.

Authors:  Christopher R Sweet; Paula Petrone; Vijay S Pande; Jesús A Izaguirre
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Fragment Pose Prediction Using Non-equilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan M Lim; Meghan Osato; Gregory L Warren; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Leif Arthur Halvorsen; Segun Jung; Xia Xiao
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Differing conformational pathways before and after chemistry for insertion of dATP versus dCTP opposite 8-oxoG in DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Sujatha Reddy; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Highly organized but pliant active site of DNA polymerase beta: compensatory mechanisms in mutant enzymes revealed by dynamics simulations and energy analyses.

Authors:  Linjing Yang; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Suse Broyde; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Principles of flexible protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Nelly Andrusier; Efrat Mashiach; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-01

Review 9.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins.

Authors:  Stewart A Adcock; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  An exact expression to calculate the derivatives of position-dependent observables in molecular simulations with flexible constraints.

Authors:  Pablo Echenique; Claudio N Cavasotto; Monica De Marco; Pablo Garca-Risueño; J L Alonso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.