Literature DB >> 9241077

Influence of BRCA1 mutations on nuclear grade and estrogen receptor status of breast carcinoma in Ashkenazi Jewish women.

S E Karp1, P N Tonin, L R Bégin, J J Martinez, J C Zhang, M N Pollak, W D Foulkes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Ashkenazim, three recurrent germline mutations have been identified in the breast carcinoma susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2: 185delAG, 5382insC (BRCA1), and 6174delT (BRCA2). The frequency of these mutations in the general Ashkenazi population approaches 2%. There is little available controlled data comparing the characteristics of breast carcinoma arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers or BRCA2 mutation carriers with that arising in noncarriers, although such data would be relevant to the urgent clinical need to develop risk-reduction strategies for individuals at increased risk due to genetic factors.
METHODS: The authors screened 149 unselected tumors arising in Ashkenazi Jewish women for the 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT mutations and compared tumors arising in mutation carriers with tumors arising in noncarriers with respect to nuclear grade, steroid hormone receptor status, and axillary lymph node status.
RESULTS: In the 149 cases, the authors found 17 BRCA1 mutations (11.4%; 95% confidence interval [ci], 6.8-17.6%), and 4 6174delT BRCA2 mutations (2.7%; 95% CI, 0.8-6.7%). Tumors from women with BRCA1 mutations were significantly less likely to be estrogen receptor positive (age-adjusted odds ratio [or]: 0.091; P < 0.001) and more likely to have a high nuclear grade (OR: 5.55; P 0.001) than tumors in which no mutation was identified. All four BRCA2 positive breast carcinoma specimens were estrogen receptor positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast carcinoma arising in Ashkenazim BRCA1 mutation carriers has adverse prognostic features relative to those arising in noncarriers in the same population. This may be relevant to the development of prevention and treatment strategies for these women. For example, if tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast carcinoma via its antiestrogenic effects, it is possible that this effect will be diminished in the largely estrogen receptor negative BRCA1-related hereditary breast carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9241077     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<435::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  The importance of a family history of breast cancer in predicting the presence of a BRCA mutation.

Authors:  W D Foulkes; J S Brunet; E Warner; P J Goodwin; W Meschino; S A Narod; P E Goss; G Glendon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins: roles in health and disease.

Authors:  J A Duncan; J R Reeves; T G Cooke
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1998-10

3.  Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA).

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Daniel Barrowdale; Irene L Andrulis; Susan M Domchek; Diana Eccles; Heli Nevanlinna; Susan J Ramus; Amanda Spurdle; Mark Robson; Mark Sherman; Anna Marie Mulligan; Fergus J Couch; Christoph Engel; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Olga M Sinilnikova; Melissa C Southey; Mary Beth Terry; David Goldgar; Frances O'Malley; Esther M John; Ramunas Janavicius; Laima Tihomirova; Thomas V O Hansen; Finn C Nielsen; Ana Osorio; Alexandra Stavropoulou; Javier Benítez; Siranoush Manoukian; Bernard Peissel; Monica Barile; Sara Volorio; Barbara Pasini; Riccardo Dolcetti; Anna Laura Putignano; Laura Ottini; Paolo Radice; Ute Hamann; Muhammad U Rashid; Frans B Hogervorst; Mieke Kriege; Rob B van der Luijt; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Carole Brewer; Lisa Walker; Mark T Rogers; Lucy E Side; Catherine Houghton; JoEllen Weaver; Andrew K Godwin; Rita K Schmutzler; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Alfons Meindl; Karin Kast; Norbert Arnold; Dieter Niederacher; Christian Sutter; Helmut Deissler; Doroteha Gadzicki; Sabine Preisler-Adams; Raymonda Varon-Mateeva; Ines Schönbuchner; Heidrun Gevensleben; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Muriel Belotti; Laure Barjhoux; Claudine Isaacs; Beth N Peshkin; Trinidad Caldes; Miguel de la Hoya; Carmen Cañadas; Tuomas Heikkinen; Päivi Heikkilä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Ignacio Blanco; Conxi Lazaro; Joan Brunet; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Adalgeir Arason; Rosa B Barkardottir; Martine Dumont; Jacques Simard; Marco Montagna; Simona Agata; Emma D'Andrea; Max Yan; Stephen Fox; Timothy R Rebbeck; Wendy Rubinstein; Nadine Tung; Judy E Garber; Xianshu Wang; Zachary Fredericksen; Vernon S Pankratz; Noralane M Lindor; Csilla Szabo; Kenneth Offit; Rita Sakr; Mia M Gaudet; Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng Tea; Christine Rappaport; Phuong L Mai; Mark H Greene; Anna Sokolenko; Evgeny Imyanitov; Amanda Ewart Toland; Leigha Senter; Kevin Sweet; Mads Thomassen; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Torben Kruse; Maria Caligo; Paolo Aretini; Johanna Rantala; Anna von Wachenfeld; Karin Henriksson; Linda Steele; Susan L Neuhausen; Robert Nussbaum; Mary Beattie; Kunle Odunsi; Lara Sucheston; Simon A Gayther; Kate Nathanson; Jenny Gross; Christine Walsh; Beth Karlan; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Genetic susceptibility loci for breast cancer by estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Stephen Chanock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with a BRCA1 mutation: results from a population-based study of young women.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Huiyan Ma; Darcy V Spicer; David Van Den Berg; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Tamoxifen and breast cancer prevention: what should you tell your patients?

Authors:  V Goel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer. Important questions remain unanswered, and existing trials should continue.

Authors:  P Bruzzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

8.  Effects of childhood body size on breast cancer tumour characteristics.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Yihong Wang; Laura C Collins; Jennifer Kaplan; Hailun Li; Rebecca Gelman; Amy H Comander; Bridget Gallagher; Katharina Fetten; Karen Krag; Kathryn A Stoeckert; Robert D Legare; Dennis Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Judy E Garber; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Timothy R Rebbeck; Sunil R Lakhani; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.