Literature DB >> 9240981

Intratester and intertester reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in the assessment of posterior laxity of the knee.

F E Huber1, J J Irrgang, C Harner, S Lephart.   

Abstract

We measured tibial translation in the knees of 22 subjects with posterior cruciate ligament tears or reconstructions by using the KT-1000 arthrometer. To assess the reliability of the device, two testers made measurements. One tester was a novice and the second tester had substantial clinical experience with the KT-1000 arthrometer. The quadriceps neutral angle was found for the uninvolved knee. Anterior and posterior translation and total anterior-posterior excursion were then measured. The quadriceps neutral angle was then reproduced in the involved knee and the same measurements were taken. Each subject was tested twice by each tester. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the novice, experienced, and intertester reliability were 0.67, 0.79, and 0.62, respectively, for corrected posterior translation; 0.59, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively, for corrected anterior translation; 0.70, 0.74, and 0.29, respectively, for quadriceps neutral angle; and 0.84, 0.83, and 0.62, respectively, for total anterior-posterior excursion. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the novice, experienced, and intertester reliability were +/-2.95, +/-2.53, and +/-3.27 mm, respectively, for corrected posterior translation; +/-3.99, +/-3.89, and +/-3.74 mm, respectively, for corrected anterior translation; and +/-10.70 degrees, +/-11.73 degrees, and +/-16.25 degrees, respectively, for quadriceps neutral angle. The KT-1000 arthrometer was found to be a moderately reliable tool for the measurement of tibial translation in patients with posterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240981     DOI: 10.1177/036354659702500410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Fabrizio Margheritini; Pier Paolo Mariani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Rolimeter measurements are suitable as substitutes to stress radiographs in the evaluation of posterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Jürgen Höher; Ralph Akoto; Philip Helm; Sven Shafizadeh; Bertil Bouillon; Maurice Balke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  N Lefevre; Y Bohu; J F Naouri; S Klouche; S Herman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Kneeling Stress Radiography: A Forgotten Yet Dependable Tool for Postero-lateral Knee Instability.

Authors:  Quamar Azam; Abhishek Chandra; Bhaskar Sarkar; Balgovind S Raja; Anjum Syed
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ninni Sernert; Janett Helmers; Catarina Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Use of a Computed Tomography Based Approach to Validate Noninvasive Devices to Measure Rotational Knee Laxity.

Authors:  Simon Neumann; Stefan Maas; Danièle Waldmann; Pierre-Louis Ricci; Arno Zürbes; Pierre-Jean Arnoux; Frédéric Walter; Jens Kelm
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2015-11-22

Review 8.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Allografts and Autografts in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cecilia de Villiers; Gregor Goetz; Patrick Sadoghi; Sabine Geiger-Gritsch
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-11

9.  Aseptically processed and chemically sterilized BTB allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Peter A Indelicato; Michael G Ciccotti; Joel Boyd; Laurence D Higgins; Benjamin S Shaffer; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 1: anatomy, biomechanics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Bálint Zsidai; Nyaluma N Wagala; Jonathan D Hughes; Alexandra Horvath; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.