Literature DB >> 9240590

Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia: long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes.

P G Crosignani1, P Vercellini, G Apolone, O De Giorgi, I Cortesi, M Meschia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare patients' satisfaction with the effect of treatment, health-related quality of life, psychologic status, and sexual functioning 2 years after endometrial resection or vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia. STUDY
DESIGN: Menorrhagic women < or = 50 years old with a mobile uterus smaller than a 12-week pregnancy were enrolled in a randomized trial to compare endometrial resection and vaginal hysterectomy. Two years after surgery the women were requested to rate the degree of satisfaction with the effect of the operation and to complete the Short Form 36 general health survey questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the revised Sabbatsberg Sexual Rating Scale.
RESULTS: Forty-one subjects underwent endometrial resection and 44 underwent vaginal hysterectomy without major complications. Of the 77 women attending the 2-year follow-up visit, 33 of 38 (86.8%) in the endometrial resection arm were very satisfied or satisfied with the treatment compared with 37 of 39 (94.8%) of those in the hysterectomy arm. According to the Short Form 36 questionnaire, social functioning and vitality scores were significantly better in the hysterectomy group than in the resection group. Significantly lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety scores were observed in the former than in the latter subjects. The Sabbatsberg Sexual Rating Scale scores were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring surgical treatment for menorrhagia vaginal hysterectomy appeared slightly more satisfying and offered a better health-related quality of life than did endometrial resection at 2-year follow-up. Hysterectomy did not adversely affect psychologic status and sexual functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240590     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70445-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Husam Abed; Thomas L Wheeler; Vivian W Sung; David D Rahn; Joseph I Schaffer; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Hysterectomy status, estrogen use and quality of life in older women: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Denise G Von Muhlen; Theodore G Ganiats; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Rosalie J Fergusson; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 4.  Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life.

Authors:  Renata Arrington; Joseph Cofrancesco; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Tranexamic acid: a potential adjunct to resectoscopic endometrial ablation.

Authors:  Bulent Ergun; Ercan Bastu; Mehmet Ozsurmeli; Cem Celik
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Total or Supracervical Hysterectomy (TOSH) Trial.

Authors:  W Jerod Greer; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler; R Edward Varner; Jeff M Szychowski; Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Readmission to hospital 5 years after hysterectomy or endometrial resection in a national cohort study.

Authors:  A Clarke; A Judge; A Herbert; K McPherson; S Bridgman; M Maresh; C Overton; D Altman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

Review 8.  Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients.

Authors:  L J Middleton; R Champaneria; J P Daniels; S Bhattacharya; K G Cooper; N H Hilken; P O'Donovan; M Gannon; R Gray; K S Khan; J Abbott; J Barrington; S Bhattacharya; M Y Bongers; J-L Brun; R Busfield; M Sowter; T J Clark; J Cooper; K G Cooper; S L Corson; K Dickersin; N Dwyer; M Gannon; J Hawe; R Hurskainen; W R Meyer; H O'Connor; S Pinion; A M Sambrook; W H Tam; I A A van Zon-Rabelink; E Zupi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-16

9.  Hysterectomy or a minimal invasive alternative? A systematic review on quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  H A M Brölmann; A J Bijdevaate; A Vonk Noordegraaf; P F Janssen; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-05-22

Review 10.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.