Literature DB >> 9240181

Which indwelling urethral catheters resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilms?

N S Morris1, D J Stickler, C Winters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the resistance of currently available types of indwelling urethral catheters to blockage by encrustation with mineralized Proteus mirabilis biofilms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Encrustation was studied in a simple laboratory model of the catheterized bladder. Artificial urine was supplied to the bladder chamber at 0.5 mL/min. The bladder urine was inoculated with a clinical strain of P. mirabilis that had been isolated from an encrusted catheter. The models were operated until the catheters blocked and atomic absorption spectrometry was used to assess the amounts of calcium and magnesium deposited on the catheters. Scanning electron microscopy was also used to locate and assess the degree of encrustation.
RESULTS: The mean times to blockage ranged from 21 h for the Bard hydrogel/silver-coated latex catheter to 56 h for the Eschmann Folatex S all-silicone catheter. The calcium and magnesium salts were mainly deposited on the 10 cm below the eye-holes of the catheters, complete blockage generally occurring in the 2 cm immediately below the eye-hole.
CONCLUSION: None of the 18 types of catheter tested, including those coated with hydrogel or silver, were capable of resisting encrustation by P. mirabilis biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240181     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  31 in total

1.  Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm?

Authors:  David Stickler; Robert Young; Gwennan Jones; Nora Sabbuba; Nicola Morris
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-07-11

Review 2.  Encrustation of biomaterials in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Greg L Shaw; Simon K Choong; Christopher Fry
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-12-22

3.  A study of the structure of the crystalline bacterial biofilms that can encrust and block silver Foley catheters.

Authors:  Sheridan D Morgan; Deborah Rigby; David J Stickler
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-02-03

4.  Biocide activity against urinary catheter pathogens.

Authors:  Sladjana Malic; Rachael P C Jordan; Mark G J Waters; David J Stickler; David W Williams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Studies on the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms on urethral catheters.

Authors:  D Stickler; N Morris; M C Moreno; N Sabbuba
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Prevention of urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ahmad Salameh; Mayar Al Mohajer; Rabih O Daroucihe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  S M Jacobsen; D J Stickler; H L T Mobley; M E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Irrigation with N,N-dichloro-2,2-dimethyltaurine (NVC-422) in a citrate buffer maintains urinary catheter patency in vitro and prevents encrustation by Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  Suriani Abdul Rani; Chris Celeri; Ron Najafi; Keith Bley; Dmitri Debabov
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  Chelsie E Armbruster; Harry L T Mobley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Differences in Bacterial Colonization and Biofilm Formation Property of Uropathogens between the Two most Commonly used Indwelling Urinary Catheters.

Authors:  Amit Verma; Deepa Bhani; Vinay Tomar; Rekha Bachhiwal; Shersingh Yadav
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.