UNLABELLED: PET tumor imaging of the abdomen and pelvis is prone to artifacts due to urinary tract activity. A new technique has been developed to reduce such artifacts and enhance study interpretation. METHODS: Thirty minutes after the injection of 18F-FDG, 500 cc 0.45% NaCl were administered intravenously over 30 min and a Foley catheter was placed in the bladder. At the start of imaging (60 min post-injection), furosemide was given (0.3 mg/kg). Prior to imaging the pelvis, the urinary catheter was clamped and saline was introduced retrograde into the bladder until full. RESULTS: This technique has been used successfully in more than 130 patients, resulting in a marked improvement in study quality and tumor detection. CONCLUSION: Hydration and administration of furosemide, along with placement of a Foley catheter in the bladder, have proven effective in eliminating image artifacts originating from the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Backfilling the bladder also provides a well-defined anatomic landmark for study interpretation.
UNLABELLED: PET tumor imaging of the abdomen and pelvis is prone to artifacts due to urinary tract activity. A new technique has been developed to reduce such artifacts and enhance study interpretation. METHODS: Thirty minutes after the injection of 18F-FDG, 500 cc 0.45% NaCl were administered intravenously over 30 min and a Foley catheter was placed in the bladder. At the start of imaging (60 min post-injection), furosemide was given (0.3 mg/kg). Prior to imaging the pelvis, the urinary catheter was clamped and saline was introduced retrograde into the bladder until full. RESULTS: This technique has been used successfully in more than 130 patients, resulting in a marked improvement in study quality and tumor detection. CONCLUSION: Hydration and administration of furosemide, along with placement of a Foley catheter in the bladder, have proven effective in eliminating image artifacts originating from the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Backfilling the bladder also provides a well-defined anatomic landmark for study interpretation.
Authors: A H Engledow; G E L Bond-Smith; D Francis; F Pakzad; J Bomanji; A Groves; P J Ell Journal: Indian J Surg Date: 2009-05-02 Impact factor: 0.656
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Arjun V Balar; William C Huang; Kimberly Jackson; Kent P Friedman Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Judit A Adam; Annika Loft; Cyrus Chargari; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Elisabeth Kidd; Heiko Schöder; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Wouter V Vogel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Laura S Mertens; Annemarie Fioole-Bruining; Erik Vegt; Wouter V Vogel; Bas Wg van Rhijn; Simon Horenblas Journal: Indian J Nucl Med Date: 2012-07