Literature DB >> 9239584

The use of ketamine or etomidate to supplement sufentanil/N2O anesthesia does not disrupt monitoring of myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses.

L H Ubags1, C J Kalkman, H D Been, M Porsius, J C Drummond.   

Abstract

Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses (tc-MERs) requires an anesthetic technique that minimally depresses response amplitudes. Acceptable results have been obtained during opioid/N2O anesthesia, provided that the concentration of N2O does not exceed 50%. However, this technique may necessitate supplementation with additional agents to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia. Etomidate and ketamine have been reported anecdotally or in nonsurgical situations to produce little tc-MER depression. We investigated the effects on tc-MER amplitude and latency of supplementation of a sufentanil/N2O anesthetic with etomidate or ketamine in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation. Anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and sufentanil 1.5 mg/kg and maintained with sufentanil 0.5 mg/kg/h and N2O 50%. Muscle relaxation was kept at 25% of control. Paired transcranial electrical stimulation was performed. Each patient randomly received either ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.1 mg/kg) as a single bolus intravenously, during stable surgical conditions. Triplicate tc-MERs were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscles before and 2, 5, 10, and 15 min after drug administration. Administration of ketamine did not significantly change tc-MER amplitudes, whereas etomidate resulted in a transient amplitude depression to 72% of control (p < 0.05) at 2 min after injection. Latency remained unchanged with both drugs. In conclusion, the data suggest that both ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.1 mg/kg) can be used to supplement sufentanil/N2O anesthetic without disrupting tc-MER monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9239584     DOI: 10.1097/00008506-199707000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  6 in total

1.  Dose and timing effect of etomidate on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial electric or magnetic stimulation in the monkey and baboon.

Authors:  Tod Sloan; J Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Evaluation of the Effect of Continuous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine or a Subanesthetic Dose Ketamine on Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery under Total Intravenous Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Roshan Andleeb; Sanjay Agrawal; Priyanka Gupta
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-08-20

3.  Monitoring of motor evoked potentials with high intensity repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Ketamine-Based Anesthetic Protocols and Evoked Potential Monitoring: A Risk/Benefit Overview.

Authors:  Nicoleta Stoicea; Gregory Versteeg; Diana Florescu; Nicholas Joseph; Juan Fiorda-Diaz; Víctor Navarrete; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ankur Khandelwal; Arvind Chaturvedi; Navdeep Sokhal; Akanksha Singh; Hanjabam Barun Sharma
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-05-20

6.  Marked attenuation of the amplitude of transcranial motor-evoked potentials after intravenous bolus administration of ketamine: a case report.

Authors:  Kenta Furutani; Mari Matsuhashi; Hiroyuki Deguchi; Yusuke Mitsuma; Nobuko Ohashi; Hiroshi Baba
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.