OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer, retroareolar tumors are observed in 5 to 20% of cases; mammectomy is the conventional treatment. Conservative surgery was used in this series of 36 patients with retroareolar cancer situated less than 2 cm from the areola. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumorectomy with resection of the areolar plaque was followed by radiotherapy. Six patients had Paget's disease of the nipple, 64% were in classes T0 or T1 and 36% in T2. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy was given for tumor reduction prior to surgery in 8 patients. Wide tumorectomy with resection of the areolar plaque and gland remodeling was performed in all patients. Three plastic surgery techniques were used. Mean tumor size was 17.3 mm (8 to 33 mm). The areola was invaded in 16 patients (44%) and the derma or retroareolar ducts in 26 (72%). RESULTS: The mean distance between the tumor and skin surface was 3.8 mm. The section surface was in healthy tissue in 31 patients and 2 patients underwent subsequent surgery for mammectomy. All patients had either pre-operative (n = 4) or post-operative (n = 32) radio-therapy. Secondary reconstruction of the nipple was performed in 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Histology findings and esthetic results suggested that this conservative approach can be proposed when the tumor is located close to the areola, as confirmed by our series and results from other teams using the same technique.
OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer, retroareolar tumors are observed in 5 to 20% of cases; mammectomy is the conventional treatment. Conservative surgery was used in this series of 36 patients with retroareolar cancer situated less than 2 cm from the areola. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumorectomy with resection of the areolar plaque was followed by radiotherapy. Six patients had Paget's disease of the nipple, 64% were in classes T0 or T1 and 36% in T2. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy was given for tumor reduction prior to surgery in 8 patients. Wide tumorectomy with resection of the areolar plaque and gland remodeling was performed in all patients. Three plastic surgery techniques were used. Mean tumor size was 17.3 mm (8 to 33 mm). The areola was invaded in 16 patients (44%) and the derma or retroareolar ducts in 26 (72%). RESULTS: The mean distance between the tumor and skin surface was 3.8 mm. The section surface was in healthy tissue in 31 patients and 2 patients underwent subsequent surgery for mammectomy. All patients had either pre-operative (n = 4) or post-operative (n = 32) radio-therapy. Secondary reconstruction of the nipple was performed in 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Histology findings and esthetic results suggested that this conservative approach can be proposed when the tumor is located close to the areola, as confirmed by our series and results from other teams using the same technique.