Literature DB >> 9238889

Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: in vivo determination of average force for use of manual and powered toothbrushes.

R L Boyd1, L McLey, R Zahradnik.   

Abstract

Mechanical oral hygiene instruments are intended to aid in the removal of stain and dental plaque from tooth surfaces. Certain home hygiene procedures, however, can lead to soft and hard tissue trauma. Power assisted brushing instruments are gaining in popularity, yet there is limited information on the interaction of these home care instruments with commercial dentifrices, and the resultant impact on oral tissues. In this study, the average forces applied during in vivo toothbrushing were determined for three powered brushing instruments (Rota-dent, Interplak and Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover) and a manual toothbrush (Oral-B P40). The Rota-dent instrument was found to be used with the lowest brushing pressure followed, in order, by the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover. Interplak and the manual toothbrush. The average amount of dentifrice applied to the three powered brush heads was directly related to the size of the head, with Rota-dent typically receiving the least and Interplak the most applied dentifrice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9238889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Dent        ISSN: 0895-8831


  9 in total

1.  Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults--frequency, technique, duration and force.

Authors:  C Ganss; N Schlueter; S Preiss; J Klimek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing.

Authors:  Heike M Korbmacher-Steiner; Arndt F Schilling; Lothar G Huck; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Michael Amling
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control.

Authors:  Amina Acherkouk; Marco Götze; Andreas Kiesow; Anantha Ramakrishnan; Sandra Sarembe; Tomas Lang; Peter Gaengler
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Analysis of tooth brushing cycles.

Authors:  Yuki Tosaka; Kuniko Nakakura-Ohshima; Nozomi Murakami; Rikako Ishii; Issei Saitoh; Yoko Iwase; Akihiro Yoshihara; Akitsugu Ohuchi; Haruaki Hayasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Brushing force of manual and sonic toothbrushes affects dental hard tissue abrasion.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; John Patrik Matthias Burkhard; Florin Eggmann; Thomas Attin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Toothbrush abrasivity in a long-term simulation on human dentin depends on brushing mode and bristle arrangement.

Authors:  Mozhgan Bizhang; Ilka Schmidt; Yong-Hee Patricia Chun; Wolfgang H Arnold; Stefan Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of four different dentifrices applied by customized automated brushing device on enamel surface abrasion: An in vitro profilometric study.

Authors:  Paromita Mazumdar; Deepshikha Chowdhury; Saikat Chatterjee; Namrata Jajoo
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

8.  Abrasion of 6 dentifrices measured by vertical scanning interference microscopy.

Authors:  Florence Pascaretti-Grizon; Guillaume Mabilleau; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Influence of Bristle Stiffness of Manual Toothbrushes on Eroded and Sound Human Dentin--An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mozhgan Bizhang; Katharina Riemer; Wolfgang H Arnold; Julia Domin; Stefan Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.