Literature DB >> 9238118

Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy: are there real advantages in comparison with the traditional open approach?

C Esposito1, F Corcione, V Garipoli, G Ascione.   

Abstract

The hospital records of patients who underwent splenectomy during the last 2 years were reviewed to compare the advantages of the laparoscopic approach with traditional open splenectomy (OS). Between March 1994 and March 1996, 16 children underwent splenectomy, in 8 using an open approach and 8 by a laparoscopic procedure. Of the patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), 2 had a concomitant cholecystectomy. Ages ranged between 4 and 11 years (mean 6.4 years); there were 9 girls and 7 boys. The indications for splenectomy were: hereditary spherocytosis (7 cases); idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (4); sickle-cell disease (3); and beta-thalassemia (2). The average operating time for OS was 100 min (range, 50-155), for LS 170 min (range 125-240). The hospital stay for patients who had OS ranged from 3 to 9 days (mean 4.7), for those who had LS from 2 to 5 days (mean 3). One OS patient developed a wound infection. In 3 of the LS patients, the spleen was removed via a 7-cm Pfannenstiel minilaparotomy in the suprapubic region; in 5 cases the spleen was captured into an extraction bag, crushed, and removed through the umbilical orifice. The authors believe that LS must be performed only when it is possible to use the extraction bag to remove the spleen from the umbilical orifice (spleens weighing less than 700 g) and when a concomitant procedure such as cholecystectomy is indicated; in other cases OS is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9238118     DOI: 10.1007/BF01258713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  10 in total

1.  The anatomical basis for laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  E C Poulin; C Thibault
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  T E Lobe; G J Presbury; B M Smith; J A Wilimas; W C Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.132

3.  Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  S Tulman; G W Holcomb; H L Karamanoukian; J Reynhout
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Laparoscopic splenectomy in the management of immune thrombocytopenia purpura.

Authors:  A T Lefor; W S Melvin; R W Bailey; J L Flowers
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Splenectomy for hematologic disease. The UCLA experience with 306 patients.

Authors:  G Musser; G Lazar; W Hocking; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic splenectomy in childhood.

Authors:  B M Smith; K P Schropp; T E Lobe; D A Rogers; G J Presbury; J A Wilimas; W C Wong
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  The suitability of automatic tissue morcellation for the endoscopic removal of large specimens in pediatric surgery.

Authors:  T E Lobe; K P Schropp; R Joyner; O Lasater; J Jenkins
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  B J Carroll; E H Phillips; C J Semel; M Fallas; L Morgenstern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional open splenectomy in childhood.

Authors:  P G Janu; D A Rogers; T E Lobe
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Laparoscopic splenectomy--technical aspects.

Authors:  B Delaitre; B Maignien
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of wandering spleen.

Authors:  F Corcione; P Caiazzo; D Cuccurullo; L Miranda; A Settembre; F Pirozzi; G Bruzzese
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for a giant splenic epidermoid cyst: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Sakamoto; S Yunotani; G Edakuni; M Mori; A Iyama; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period.

Authors:  Katherine Moore; Armando J Lorenzo; Suzanne Turner; Darius J Bägli; Joao L Pippi Salle; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Laparoscopic Splenectomy Alone for Sickle Cell Disease: Account of 50 paediatric cases.

Authors:  Zainab N Al-Balushi; Khalid M Bhatti; Muhammad T Ehsan; Yousuf Al-Shaqsi; Nawal A R Al-Sharji; Hatem A A Mady; Mahmoud H Sherif
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.