Literature DB >> 9237140

Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post.

D B Mendoza1, W S Eakle, E A Kahl, R Ho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the ability of resin-bonded posts to reinforce teeth that are structurally weak in the cervical area against fracture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty canine roots were endodontically treated and randomly distributed into four groups of 10. Parallel-sided preformed posts were cemented into the roots of these teeth after their crowns were removed. The cervical third of the canals were flared to simulate teeth weakened in this area as a result of caries or endodontic therapy. Three resin cements and a zine-phosphate cement, which was used as the control, were used to secure the posts into the roots. Cemented posts were loaded in an Instron testing machine with a gradually increasing force at a 60-degree angle to the long axis of the root until the root fractured.
RESULTS: Roots in which the posts were cemented with Panavia were significantly more resistant to fracture than those where zinc phosphate was used (p < 0.05). Because of the inability to determine exactly the point of failure of the zinc-phosphate cement, no statistically significant difference was found when compared with the other two resin cements (ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9237140     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70081-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  24 in total

1.  Effect of the ferrule on fracture resistance of teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite cores.

Authors:  Annet Kutesa-Mutebi; Yusuf I Osman
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of post system and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human anterior teeth.

Authors:  Sahil Jindal; Ritu Jindal; Sandeep Mahajan; Rohini Dua; Namita Jain; Sunila Sharma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts.

Authors:  A Sahafi; A Peutzfeldt; G Ravnholt; E Asmussen; K Gotfredsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of type of luting cement used with all-ceramic crowns on load capability of post-restored endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.

Authors:  Anja Preuss; Martin Rosentritt; Roland Frankenberger; Florian Beuer; Michael Naumann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal.

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Knowledge, attitudes and practice of restoring endodontically treated teeth by dentists in north of saudi arabia.

Authors:  Iftikhar Akbar
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-01

7.  Retrospective analysis of survival rates of post-and-cores in a dental school setting.

Authors:  Nicole Martino; Caroline Truong; Arthur E Clark; Edgar O'Neill; Shu-Min Hsu; Dan Neal; Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post.

Authors:  Jasjit Kaur; Navneet Sharma; Harpal Singh
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-10-01

9.  Fracture load of tooth restored with fiber post and experimental short fiber composite.

Authors:  Jasmina Bijelic; Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka K Vallittu; Lippo V J Lassila
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-03-29

10.  Comparative evaluation of the reinforcing effect of different post systems in the restoration of endodontically treated human anterior teeth at two different lengths of post space preparation- an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sahil Jindal; Ritu Jindal; Kanika Gupta; Sandeep Mahajan; Sunidhi Garg
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.