Literature DB >> 9236962

Determinants of tick-avoidance behaviors in an endemic area for Lyme disease.

N A Shadick1, L H Daltroy, C B Phillips, U S Liang, M H Liang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tick bite control is an important initiative to prevent Lyme disease and other tickborne infections. While several studies have demonstrated that knowledge and awareness of Lyme disease in endemic areas are good, none has evaluated the relative importance of knowledge with other attitudinal and health belief variables to determine motivators of preventive behavior.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 304 commuter ferry passengers departing Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts, in August 1992, to ascertain the prevalence of tick-avoidance behaviors among individuals from an endemic area of Lyme disease and to identify the knowledge, behavioral, and demographic variables that best determine precautionary behavior.
RESULTS: Overall, survey respondents (n = 304) had very good knowledge of Lyme disease (73% items correct on a knowledge test), but only 59% of respondents reported limiting time in tick areas, 58% usually wore protective clothing, 40% wore tick repellent, and 66% usually performed tick checks. By stepwise linear regression analysis, determinants of tick-avoidance behaviors included perceiving the behavior's benefits as outweighing its inconvenience (P < .0001), having confidence in recognizing Lyme disease symptoms (P < .0004), believing that Lyme disease is a serious illness (P < .0009), and believing that the avoidance behavior is effective in reducing the risk of Lyme disease (P < .01). Younger respondents (P < .05) performed fewer avoidance behaviors. Visitors (P < .0001) performed fewer tick checks than residents. Having confidence that one could find a tick on oneself with a tick check also predicted performance (P < .008). Increased general knowledge about Lyme disease did not predict any protective behaviors.
CONCLUSIONS: Precautionary behaviors were underperformed in an at-risk population despite good knowledge of Lyme disease symptoms and transmission. Instead, performance was related to confidence in finding a tick on oneself and a perception that a precaution's benefit outweighed its inconvenience and would adequately reduce risk for Lyme disease. These data have implications for Lyme disease prevention programs, which typically focus on enhancing general knowledge as a means toward disease reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

Review 1.  Occupational risk of Lyme disease: an epidemiological review.

Authors:  J D Piacentino; B S Schwartz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Behavioral and attitudes survey about Lyme disease among a Brazilian population in the endemic area of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts.

Authors:  Jenny E Heller; Elizabeth Benito-Garcia; Nancy E Maher; Lori B Chibnik; Colin P Maher; Nancy A Shadick
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-09-16

3.  Knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding tick bites in the Turkish population in a rural area of the Middle Anatolian Region.

Authors:  Inci Arikan; Nilgün Kasifoglu; Selma Metintas; Cemalettin Kalyoncu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  U.S. public's experience with ticks and tick-borne diseases: Results from national HealthStyles surveys.

Authors:  Sarah A Hook; Christina A Nelson; Paul S Mead
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.744

5.  Tick-Borne Disease Prevention Behaviors Among Participants in a Tick Surveillance System Compared with a Sample Of Master Gardeners.

Authors:  Heather L Kopsco; Thomas N Mather
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-11-02

6.  Tick trails: the role of online recreational trail reviews in identifying risk factors and behavioral recommendations associated with tick encounters in Indiana.

Authors:  Kristina R Anderson; Jordan Blekking; Oghenekaro Omodior
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Ticking all the boxes? A systematic review of education and communication interventions to prevent tick-borne disease.

Authors:  Fiona Mowbray; Richard Amlôt; G James Rubin
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.133

8.  Review of methods to prevent and reduce the risk of Lyme disease.

Authors:  L R Lindsay; N H Ogden; S W Schofield
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2015-06-04

9.  Study on public perceptions and protective behaviors regarding Lyme disease among the general public in the Netherlands: implications for prevention programs.

Authors:  Desirée Jacqueline Mathieu Angélique Beaujean; Marloes Bults; Jim Everardus van Steenbergen; Hélene Antoine Claire Marie Voeten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Experience of Lyme disease and preferences for precautions: a cross-sectional survey of UK patients.

Authors:  Afrodita Marcu; Julie Barnett; David Uzzell; Konstantina Vasileiou; Susan O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.