UNLABELLED: Patients with significant stenosis at the carotid bifurcation are traditionally subjected to four vessel aortic arch angiography prior to consideration for carotid endarterectomy. The advent of the non-invasive vascular laboratory has necessitated a reappraisal of this approach. AIMS: 1. Determine the yield from aortic arch angiography and its influence on surgical management. 2. Evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination and the non-invasive vascular laboratory in the detection of aortic arch branch lesions. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for carotid endarterectomy were prospectively enrolled into the study. The protocol entailed: 1. Clinical recording of upper limb pulses, blood pressure and supraclavicular bruits. 2. Duplex scan examination to evaluate proximal inflow into the carotid arteries. 3. Four vessel aortic arch angiography to detect aortic branch lesions. Data from the non-invasive tests were compared to angiography. Patients with aortic arch branch lesions were further evaluated to determine the proportion requiring additional surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had angiographic evidence of aortic branch disease (14.7%); six involved the common carotid artery, three the innominate artery and 10 the subclavian artery. All of these lesions were detected by the combination of unequal blood pressure, pulse deficit, bruit or duplex scan. Seven patients underwent additional surgery (5.4%) which included carotid-subclavian bypass (five), aortoinnominate bypass (one) and innominate endarterectomy (one). CONCLUSION: In patients with significant stenosis at the carotid bifurcation undergoing evaluation for carotid endarterectomy, aortic arch angiography is unnecessary except in a small percentage of patients with abnormal clinical and non-invasive findings.
UNLABELLED: Patients with significant stenosis at the carotid bifurcation are traditionally subjected to four vessel aortic arch angiography prior to consideration for carotid endarterectomy. The advent of the non-invasive vascular laboratory has necessitated a reappraisal of this approach. AIMS: 1. Determine the yield from aortic arch angiography and its influence on surgical management. 2. Evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination and the non-invasive vascular laboratory in the detection of aortic arch branch lesions. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for carotid endarterectomy were prospectively enrolled into the study. The protocol entailed: 1. Clinical recording of upper limb pulses, blood pressure and supraclavicular bruits. 2. Duplex scan examination to evaluate proximal inflow into the carotid arteries. 3. Four vessel aortic arch angiography to detect aortic branch lesions. Data from the non-invasive tests were compared to angiography. Patients with aortic arch branch lesions were further evaluated to determine the proportion requiring additional surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had angiographic evidence of aortic branch disease (14.7%); six involved the common carotid artery, three the innominate artery and 10 the subclavian artery. All of these lesions were detected by the combination of unequal blood pressure, pulse deficit, bruit or duplex scan. Seven patients underwent additional surgery (5.4%) which included carotid-subclavian bypass (five), aortoinnominate bypass (one) and innominate endarterectomy (one). CONCLUSION: In patients with significant stenosis at the carotid bifurcation undergoing evaluation for carotid endarterectomy, aortic arch angiography is unnecessary except in a small percentage of patients with abnormal clinical and non-invasive findings.
Authors: Victor Aboyans; Aruna Kamineni; Matthew A Allison; Mary McGrae McDermott; John R Crouse; Hanyu Ni; Moyses Szklo; Michael H Criqui Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 5.162