Literature DB >> 9236593

Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer.

T T Tsue1, S S Desyatnikova, F W Deleyiannis, N D Futran, B C Stack, E A Weymuller, M G Glenn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost and functional results of free and pedicled soft tissue reconstruction after posterior oral cavity and oropharyngeal extirpation.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients undergoing extirpation with primary soft tissue reconstruction from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 298 days.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. INTERVENTION: Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF); 29 patients, with a fasciocutaneous free flap (FF) (27 radial forearm, 1 lateral arm, and 1 scapular). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct (inpatient hospital resources used and monetary costs) and intangible (post-operative complications and function) costs.
RESULTS: Operative time was longer for FF reconstructions (P = .003), but both patient groups had similar intensive care unit and hospital stays. Treatment cost for FF reconstructions was $41,122, compared with $37,160 for PMMF reconstructions (P = .003). This difference was due to increased professional fees for FF reconstruction (P < .001) which was offset by intangible cost differences. The PMMF group tended toward an increased rate of flap-related complications, compared with the FF group. At last follow-up, 4 patients in the FF group (15%) and 3 in the PMMF group (15%) had their tracheotomy. In contrast, 17 (85%) patients in the PMMF group and 11 (39%) patients in the FF group required enteral tube feedings (P = .002). Also, 18 (64%) patients in the FF group were eating at least a soft diet compared with 6 (30%) patients in the PMMF group (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of direct costs reveals only a modest difference in reconstruction costs that is outweighed by the intangible costs of PMMF reconstruction. The functional benefits of FF reconstruction appear to justify its slight increased expense and its use rather than PMMF reconstruction after extirpation in the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236593     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900070075012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  13 in total

Review 1.  Economic burden of head and neck cancer. A literature review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Lee; Marco Turini; Marc F Botteman; Jennifer M Stephens; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

Review 2.  Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Early Oropharyngeal Tumors: a Never-Ending Debate.

Authors:  Yan Monnier; Christian Simon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-09

3.  Assessment of Masticatory Function in Oral Cancer Patients with Mandibulectomy Followed by Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kumar M Vinchurkar; Rashmi S Patil; Manoj Togale; Vishwanath Pattanshetti
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-11

4.  Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Oliver Lotter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Reconstruction with Free Versus Local Flaps.

Authors:  Chun-Ta Liao; Yu-Wen Wen; Shu-Ru Lee; Lan-Yan Yang; Chih-Hung Lin; Shu-Hang Ng; Tsang-Wu Liu; Sen-Tien Tsai; Ming-Hsui Tsai; Jin-Ching Lin; Chih-Yen Chien; Pei-Jen Lou; Cheng-Ping Wang; Pen-Yuan Chu; Yi-Shing Leu; Kuo-Yang Tsai; Shyuang-Der Terng; Tsung-Ming Chen; Cheng-Hsu Wang; Wen-Cheng Chen; Li-Yu Lee; Chien-Yu Lin; Hung-Ming Wang; Tuan-Jen Fang; Shiang-Fu Huang; Chung-Jan Kang; Kai-Ping Chang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Modern reconstruction techniques for oral and pharyngeal defects after tumor resection.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Alessandra Rinaldo; Eric M Genden; Carlos Suárez; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Johannes J Fagan; Luiz P Kowalski; Alfio Ferlito; C René Leemans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Safe osteocutaneous radial forearm flap harvest with prophylactic internal fixation.

Authors:  Yelizaveta Shnayder; Terance T Tsue; E Bruce Toby; Andreas H Werle; Douglas A Girod
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-09

8.  Analysis of 120 pectoralis major flaps for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Young Sun You; Chul Hoon Chung; Yong Joon Chang; Kuyl Hee Kim; Sung Won Jung; Young Soo Rho
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-09-12

9.  Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions.

Authors:  G Colletti; L Autelitano; K Tewfik; D Rabbiosi; F Biglioli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Reimbursement for reconstruction by tissue transfer-a European comparison.

Authors:  Oliver Lotter; William Arthur Townley; Philipp Gonser; Hans-Eberhard Schaller; Sebastian Hoefert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.