BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) involved in restenosis after angioplasty is not well understood. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM MHC) isoforms (SM1 and SM2) are specific markers for SMC differentiation. In particular, SM2 is useful as a marker of mature SMCs. SMemb is a nonmuscle myosin heavy chain (NM MHC) whose expression is upregulated in immature or activated SMC. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine SMC phenotypes in neointimal tissues after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), we performed immunohistochemistry on human coronary arteries with antibodies against alpha-SM actin, SM1, SM2, and SMemb. Tissues were obtained from six autopsied patients and from atherectomy specimens from 16 patients who had undergone PTCA. Medial SMCs were positive for alpha-actin, SM1, and SM2. Expression of SM1 and SM2 in the neointima varied with the time after intervention, whereas alpha-actin was constitutively expressed in all cases studied. Neointimal cells at 16 and 20 days after PTCA contained alpha-actin but little or no SM1 or SM2, indicating that these cells modulated their phenotype to the immature state. Neointimal SMCs recovered SM MHC expression, first SM1 and then SM2, by 6 months after PTCA. Increased expression of SMemb was found in the neointima but without apparent relationship to the time after PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal SMCs show features of an undifferentiated state, indicated by altered expression of SM MHC, and undergo redifferentiation in a time-dependent manner. The expression of SM MHC isoforms provides insight into the biology of healing after angioplasty and furnishes useful tools for the understanding of the roles of differentiation and phenotypic modulation of SMCs in human vascular lesions.
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) involved in restenosis after angioplasty is not well understood. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM MHC) isoforms (SM1 and SM2) are specific markers for SMC differentiation. In particular, SM2 is useful as a marker of mature SMCs. SMemb is a nonmuscle myosin heavy chain (NM MHC) whose expression is upregulated in immature or activated SMC. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine SMC phenotypes in neointimal tissues after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), we performed immunohistochemistry on human coronary arteries with antibodies against alpha-SM actin, SM1, SM2, and SMemb. Tissues were obtained from six autopsied patients and from atherectomy specimens from 16 patients who had undergone PTCA. Medial SMCs were positive for alpha-actin, SM1, and SM2. Expression of SM1 and SM2 in the neointima varied with the time after intervention, whereas alpha-actin was constitutively expressed in all cases studied. Neointimal cells at 16 and 20 days after PTCA contained alpha-actin but little or no SM1 or SM2, indicating that these cells modulated their phenotype to the immature state. Neointimal SMCs recovered SM MHC expression, first SM1 and then SM2, by 6 months after PTCA. Increased expression of SMemb was found in the neointima but without apparent relationship to the time after PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal SMCs show features of an undifferentiated state, indicated by altered expression of SM MHC, and undergo redifferentiation in a time-dependent manner. The expression of SM MHC isoforms provides insight into the biology of healing after angioplasty and furnishes useful tools for the understanding of the roles of differentiation and phenotypic modulation of SMCs in humanvascular lesions.
Authors: Marco Ghionzoli; Andrea Repele; Laura Sartiani; Giulia Costanzi; Astrid Parenti; Valentina Spinelli; Anna L David; Massimo Garriboli; Giorgia Totonelli; Jun Tian; Stelios T Andreadis; Elisabetta Cerbai; Alessandro Mugelli; Antonio Messineo; Agostino Pierro; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tanchun Wang; Derek M Kendig; Shaohua Chang; Danielle M Trappanese; Samuel Chacko; Robert S Moreland Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2012-08-15
Authors: Megan E Cavet; Elaine M Smolock; Prashanthi Menon; Atsushi Konishi; Vyacheslav A Korshunov; Bradford C Berk Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Sammy D D Eghbalieh; Paraag Chowdhary; Akihito Muto; Kenneth R Ziegler; Fabio A Kudo; Jose M Pimiento; Issa Mirmehdi; Lynn S Model; Yuka Kondo; Toshiya Nishibe; Alan Dardik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Michael Ragosta; John A Hossack; Brian R Wamhoff Journal: J Vasc Res Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 1.934
Authors: Keren Borensztajn; Jurriën Stiekema; Sebastiaan Nijmeijer; Pieter H Reitsma; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; C Arnold Spek Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Gorav Ailawadi; Christopher W Moehle; Hong Pei; Sandra P Walton; Zequan Yang; Irving L Kron; Christine L Lau; Gary K Owens Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.209