Literature DB >> 9236161

Protected Values

.   

Abstract

Protected values are those that resist trade-offs with other values, particularly economic values. We propose that such values arise from deontological rules concerning action. People are concerned about their participation in transactions rather than just with the consequences that result. This proposal implies that protected values, defined as those that display trade-off resistance, will also tend to display quantity insensitivity, agent relativity, and moral obligation. People will also tend to experience anger at the thought of making trade-offs, and to engage in denial of the need for trade-offs through wishful thinking. These five properties were correlated with tradeoff resistance (across different values, within subjects) in five studies in which subjects answered several questions about each of several values, or in which they indicated their willingness to pay to prevent some harmful action. These correlations were found even when the subjects could not tell the experimenters which values they were responding to, so they cannot be ascribed entirely to subjects' desire to express commitment. We discuss implications for value measurement and public policy.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236161     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  9 in total

1.  Chronic Disease Decision Making and "What Matters Most".

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Richard L Street; Andrew B Cohen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Impact of uncertainty and ambiguous outcome phrasing on moral decision-making.

Authors:  Yiyun Shou; Joel Olney; Michael Smithson; Fei Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pay Your Debts: Moral Dilemmas of International Debt.

Authors:  Alessandro Del Ponte; Peter DeScioli
Journal:  Polit Behav       Date:  2021-01-06

4.  Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game.

Authors:  Carmen Tanner; Stefan Linder; Matthias Sohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Life or limb: an international qualitative study on decision making in sarcoma surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Samantha Bunzli; Penny O'Brien; Will Aston; Miguel A Ayerza; Lester Chan; Stephane Cherix; Jorge de Las Heras; Davide Donati; Uwale Eyesan; Nicola Fabbri; Michelle Ghert; Thomas Hilton; Oluwaseyi Kayode Idowu; Jungo Imanishi; Ajay Puri; Peter Rose; Dundar Sabah; Robert Turcotte; Kristy Weber; Michelle M Dowsey; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Climate solution or corporate co-optation? US and Canadian publics' views on agricultural gene editing.

Authors:  Sara Nawaz; Terre Satterfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do I care for you or for me? Processing of protected and non-protected moral values in subjects with extreme scores on the Dark Triad.

Authors:  Kai Ueltzhöffer; Corinna Roth; Corinne Neukel; Katja Bertsch; Friederike Nüssel; Sabine C Herpertz
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 5.760

8.  Debunking the Myth of Value-Neutral Virginity: Toward Truth in Scientific Advertising.

Authors:  David R Mandel; Philip E Tetlock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30

9.  Social comfort zones for transformative conservation decisions in a changing climate.

Authors:  Shannon Hagerman; Terre Satterfield; Sara Nawaz; Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent; Robert Kozak; Robin Gregory
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 7.563

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.