Literature DB >> 9233867

End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

R L Levine1, M A Wayne, C C Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival after cardiac arrest occurring outside the hospital averages less than 3 percent. Unfortunately, the outcome of prolonged resuscitative attempts cannot be predicted. End-tidal carbon dioxide levels reflect cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We prospectively determined whether death could be predicted by monitoring end-tidal carbon dioxide during resuscitation after cardiac arrest.
METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 150 consecutive victims of cardiac arrest outside the hospital who had electrical activity but no pulse. The patients were intubated and evaluated by mainstream end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. Our hypothesis was that an end-tidal carbon dioxide level of 10 mm Hg or less after 20 minutes of standard advanced cardiac life support would predict death.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean age or initial end-tidal carbon dioxide level between patients who survived to hospital admission (survivors) and those who did not (nonsurvivors). After 20 minutes of advanced cardiac life support, end-tidal carbon dioxide (+/-SD) averaged 4.4+/-2.9 mm Hg in nonsurvivors and 32.8+/-7.4 mm Hg in survivors (P< 0.001). A 20-minute end-tidal carbon dioxide value of 10 mm Hg or less successfully discriminated between the 35 patients who survived to hospital admission and the 115 nonsurvivors. When a 20-minute end-tidal carbon dioxide value of 10 mm Hg or less was used as a screening test to predict death, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were all 100 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: An end-tidal carbon dioxide level of 10 mm Hg or less measured 20 minutes after the initiation of advanced cardiac life support accurately predicts death in patients with cardiac arrest associated with electrical activity but no pulse. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation may reasonably be terminated in such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9233867     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199707313370503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  58 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring CO2 in shock states.

Authors:  Pierre-Eric Danin; Nils Siegenthaler; Jacques Levraut; Gilles Bernardin; Jean Dellamonica; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Using the features of the time and volumetric capnogram for classification and prediction.

Authors:  Michael B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Capnometry in the prehospital setting: are we using its potential?

Authors:  Dejan Kupnik; Pavel Skok
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Physiologic monitoring of CPR quality during adult cardiac arrest: A propensity-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Peter A Meaney; Alexis A Topjian; Christopher S Parshuram; Dana P Edelson; Stephen Schexnayder; Benjamin S Abella; Raina M Merchant; Melania Bembea; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  A quantitative comparison of physiologic indicators of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Diastolic blood pressure versus end-tidal carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Ryan W Morgan; Benjamin French; Todd J Kilbaugh; Maryam Y Naim; Heather Wolfe; George Bratinov; Wesley Shoap; Ting-Chang Hsieh; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  What is extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Authors:  Federico Pappalardo; Andrea Montisci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and trauma.

Authors:  Scott A Goldberg; Jeffery C Metzger; Paul E Pepe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Qiuming Liao; Trygve Sjöberg; Audrius Paskevicius; Björn Wohlfart; Stig Steen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.