Literature DB >> 9233865

Ceftriaxone compared with doxycycline for the treatment of acute disseminated Lyme disease.

R J Dattwyler1, B J Luft, M J Kunkel, M F Finkel, G P Wormser, T J Rush, E Grunwaldt, W A Agger, M Franklin, D Oswald, L Cockey, D Maladorno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Localized Lyme disease, manifested by erythema migrans, is usually treated with oral doxycycline or amoxicillin. Whether acute disseminated Borrelia burgdorferi infection should be treated differently from localized infection is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing parenteral ceftriaxone (2 g once daily for 14 days) with oral doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 21 days) in patients with acute disseminated B. burgdorferi infection but without meningitis. The erythema migrans skin lesion was required for study entry, and disseminated disease had to be indicated by either multiple erythema migrans lesions or objective evidence of organ involvement.
RESULTS: Of 140 patients enrolled, 133 had multiple erythema migrans lesions. Both treatments were highly effective. Rates of clinical cure at the last evaluation were similar among the patients treated with ceftriaxone (85 percent) and those treated with doxycycline (88 percent); treatment was considered to have failed in only one patient in each group. Among patients whose infections were cured, 18 of 67 patients in the ceftriaxone group (27 percent) reported one or more residual symptoms at the last follow-up visit, as did 10 of 71 patients in the doxycycline group (14 percent, P > or = 0.05). Mild arthralgia was the most common persistent symptom. Both regimens were well tolerated; only four patients (6 percent) in each group withdrew because of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute disseminated Lyme disease but without meningitis, oral doxycycline and parenterally administered ceftriaxone were equally effective in preventing the late manifestations of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9233865     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199707313370501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  35 in total

1.  Neuroborreliosis (Nervous System Lyme Disease).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  [Multiple erythema].

Authors:  B Brunner; U Neubert; M J Flaig; C A Sander
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Central Nervous System Lyme Disease.

Authors:  John J. Halperin
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Is neuroborreliosis a medical emergency?

Authors:  John J Halperin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Lyme disease: Is it or is it not?

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  Chronic Lyme disease.

Authors:  Paul M Lantos
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.982

7.  A man with cardiac Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Jarne M van Hattem; Jan T Keijer; Robin Nijveldt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The Lyme vaccine: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  L E Nigrovic; K M Thompson
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  Comparison of Clinical Course and Treatment Outcome for Patients With Early Disseminated or Early Localized Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  Daša Stupica; Vera Maraspin; Petra Bogovic; Katarina Ogrinc; Rok Blagus; Tjaša Cerar; Franc Strle
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 10.  Chronic Lyme disease: a review.

Authors:  Adriana Marques
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.