Literature DB >> 9233661

The western immunoblot for Lyme disease: determination of sensitivity, specificity, and interpretive criteria with use of commercially available performance panels.

R C Tilton1, M N Sand, M Manak.   

Abstract

Recent recommendations for the serological diagnosis of Lyme disease include statements on quality assurance and the use of performance panels to assess laboratory competency. We used two performance panels--one from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and one from Boston Biomedica Inc. (West Bridgewater, MA)-to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of four western blot kits. We used the same panels to compare the interpretive criteria for western blots as proposed by participants in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors Conference and those proposed by BBI Clinical Laboratories (BBICL; New Britain, CT). Our results indicated that the BBICL western blots were more sensitive than those of the CDC, MarDx (Carlsbad, CA), or Cambridge Biotech (Rockville, MD). However, use of the CDC criteria with the BBICL western blots increased specificity to 100% but reduced sensitivity to 74.3%. A sample table is provided as an example of the test results obtained with the BBI performance panel. Obviously, this work should be confirmed by other investigators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9233661     DOI: 10.1086/516173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  8 in total

1.  Identifying diagnostic peptides for lyme disease through epitope discovery.

Authors:  G A Kouzmitcheva; V A Petrenko; G P Smith
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-01

2.  Comparison of Western immunoblotting and the C6 Lyme antibody test for laboratory detection of Lyme disease.

Authors:  Elena Mogilyansky; Chien Chang Loa; Martin E Adelson; Eli Mordechai; Richard C Tilton
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-09

3.  Lyme disease: the next decade.

Authors:  Raphael B Stricker; Lorraine Johnson
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  The Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease in Humans, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of North American Research.

Authors:  Lisa A Waddell; Judy Greig; Mariola Mascarenhas; Shannon Harding; Robbin Lindsay; Nicholas Ogden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Commercial test kits for detection of Lyme borreliosis: a meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Authors:  Michael J Cook; Basant K Puri
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2016-11-18

Review 6.  Is there a Lyme-like disease in Australia? Summary of the findings to date.

Authors:  Melissa Judith Chalada; John Stenos; Richard Stewart Bradbury
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2016-04-07

7.  Dual-mode ultrasound radiomics and intrinsic imaging phenotypes for diagnosis of lymph node lesions.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Jianwei Jiang; Jie Shi; Wanying Chang; Jun Shi; Man Chen; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

8.  Application of Bayesian decision-making to laboratory testing for Lyme disease and comparison with testing for HIV.

Authors:  Michael J Cook; Basant K Puri
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2017-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.