Literature DB >> 9233591

Stem cell mobilization in resistant or relapsed lymphoma: superior yield of progenitor cells following a salvage regimen comprising ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin compared to intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide.

I G McQuaker1, A P Haynes, C Stainer, S Anderson, N H Russell.   

Abstract

We analysed the factors influencing the efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in patients with lymphoma. Sixty-six patients underwent initial PBSC collection following mobilization with chemotherapy plus recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (300 microg/d). Patients were mobilized with one of two chemotherapy regimens, either cyclophophamide (3 g/m2 or 4 g/m2) (n = 50) or ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin (IVE; n = 16). The target of collecting > 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 43/66 (65%) patients with a median of two apheresis procedures. The IVE plus G-CSF mobilization regimen gave a significantly higher median yield of CD34+ cells (8.62 x 10(6)/kg) compared with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (3.59 x 10(6)/kg) (P = 0.045). The median yield of CD34+ cells per leukapheresis was almost twice as high in patients receiving IVE (1.94 x 10(6)/kg) compared to cyclophosphamide (1.03 x 10(6)/kg) (P = 0.035). In a univariate analysis of the factors affecting mobilization, the subtype of lymphoma (high-grade NHL) and the mobilization regimen were the only factors associated with high CD34+ cell yield. However, in a multivariate analysis of factors affecting mobilization including age, lymphoma subtype, previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy, only the use of the IVE protocol was predictive of a high yield of CD34+ cells. In 13 patients undergoing a second mobilization procedure the use of IVE was associated with a significantly higher yield of CD34+ cells compared to cyclophosphamide; three patients who failed cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF mobilization were able to proceed to transplantation following successful mobilization with IVE + G-CSF. These results demonstrate that IVE is a highly effective mobilization regimen which is superior to cyclophophamide and has the benefit of being effective salvage therapy for lymphoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9233591     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1812998.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  3 in total

1.  Peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

Authors:  J L Byrne; N H Russell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.

Authors:  M J Watts; S J Ings; D Leverett; A MacMillan; S Devereux; A H Goldstone; D C Linch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels.

Authors:  E J Kanfer; D McGuigan; D Samson; Z Abboudi; G Abrahamson; J F Apperley; S Chilcott; C Craddock; J Davis; C MacDonald; D Macdonald; E Olavarria; N Philpott; G J Rustin; M J Seckl; M Sekhar; S Stern; E S Newlands
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.