Literature DB >> 9232751

Bladder autoaugmentation in adult patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction.

M Stöhrer1, G Kramer, M Goepel, D Löchner-Ernst, D Kruse, H Rübben.   

Abstract

Bladder autoaugmentation offers an alternative to enterocystoplasties for patients with low capacity high pressure bladders caused by non-malignant pathology. In particular for patients with neuropathic hyperreflexive bladders, refractory to less invasive therapy, bladder autoaugmentation will attain comparable results with less impact on life quality compared to other bladder augmentation procedures. The procedure does not preclude later enterocystoplasty or deafferentations. Over the last 7 years, 50 patients were treated by this method, some of them for other than neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Substantial increase of bladder capacity and compliance resulted, at the cost of increased residual urine and the need for intermittent catheterisation in most patients. Some patients are able to perform complete voiding at will. The time lapse between surgery and functional rehabilitation of the bladder (substantial increase of capacity and detrusor compliance) cannot be predicted yet. In most patients this amelioration was observed 1-6 months after surgery, but in some the effect was equivocal for a year or longer. Low-dose anticholinergics appear to speed up the therapeutic effect. One patient had enterocystoplasty and one deafferentation later, one had rupture of the bladder, probably from the use of an artificial sphincter, and two are rated as failures because of psychogenic bladder-centred problems. Bladder autoaugmentation is a favourable treatment for patients who are motivated to wait possibly longer for functional changes to occur and are willing to perform intermittent catheterisation afterwards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232751     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinal reflex control of micturition after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Changfeng Tai; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  [Neurourology. Current developments and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  J Kutzenberger; J Pannek; M Stöhrer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Neurogenic detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Arun Sahai; Eduardo Cortes; Jai Seth; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Jalesh Panicker; Cornelius Kelleher; Thomas M Kessler; Clare J Fowler; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Urinary considerations for adult patients with spinal dysraphism.

Authors:  Paul W Veenboer; Laetitia M O de Kort; Rafal J Chrzan; Tom P V M de Jong
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  [Ureterocystoplasty: functional results and possible problem areas].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Melchior; S Schumacher; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  The role of neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder.

Authors:  Aaron H Lay; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Satisfaction with Urinary Incontinence Treatments in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sheng-Fu Chen; Yu Khun Lee; Hann-Chorng Kuo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Long-term outcomes of urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  E U Johnson; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.