Literature DB >> 9232741

Awareness of dying: prevalence, causes and consequences.

C Seale1, J Addington-Hall, M McCarthy.   

Abstract

Analysis of a subset of data from a survey of 3696 relatives, friends and others who knew a sample of people dying in 1990 who lived in 20 areas of the United Kingdom (the Regional Study of Care for the Dying) is reported. Using the typology of awareness contexts developed by Glaser and Strauss [(1965) Awareness of Dying, Aldine, Chicago], the prevalence of different awareness contexts is described and compared with an earlier survey done in 1969. Open awareness of dying, where both the dying person and the respondent knew that the person was dying, is the most prevalent awareness context. This is particularly so in cancer and represents a change since 1969 when closed awareness (where the respondent knows, but the dying person does not) was more common. The characteristics of those dying in open and closed awareness contexts are then compared, suggesting that having cancer, not being mentally confused, having a respondent who knew for some time that the person was dying, and being of higher social class are independently predictive of full open awareness, a condition marked both by knowledge of dying, and a value commitment towards openness. Compared with people in closed awareness, people dying in full awareness are more able to plan their dying careers, so that they and their respondents are more satisfied with the degree of choice over the place of death, they are less likely to die alone, and are more likely to die in their own homes. Additionally, these individuals are more likely to have spoken of their wishes for euthanasia, another indicator of their desire to control the manner and timing of death. If dying from cancer, people in full open awareness are more likely to have received hospice care. It is suggested that underlying these patterns, and in contrast with some other cultures where awareness of dying is seen as less desirable, people dying in Anglophone countries are particularly concerned to maintain control over projects of self-identity. Their approach to death is a reflection of this individualism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232741     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00379-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  18 in total

1.  Gender differences in the evolution of illness understanding among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Kalen Fletcher; Holly G Prigerson; Elizabeth Paulk; Jennifer Temel; Esme Finlay; Lisa Marr; Ruth McCorkle; Lorna Rivera; Francisco Munoz; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-09

2.  How to justify avoidance of communications related to death anxiety in the health care system.

Authors:  Murat Sariyar
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

3.  Association between advanced cancer patient-caregiver agreement regarding prognosis and hospice enrollment.

Authors:  Kelly M Trevino; Holly G Prigerson; Megan Johnson Shen; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Illness Understanding and Advance Care Planning in Patients with Advanced Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kelly M Trevino; Sarah C Rutherford; Chrystal Marte; Daniel Jie Ouyang; Peter Martin; Holly G Prigerson; John P Leonard
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyung Hee Han; Sohee Park; Byeong Woo Park; Chi-Heum Cho; Sung Kim; Dae Ho Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Eun Sook Lee; Jung Hun Kang; Si-Young Kim; Jung Lim Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Chang Geol Lee; Yeun Keun Lim; Sam Yong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Hyun Sik Jeong; Mison Chun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Fluctuating awareness of treatment goals among patients and their caregivers: a longitudinal study of a dynamic process.

Authors:  Catherine M Burns; Dorothy H Broom; Wayne T Smith; Keith Dear; Paul S Craft
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Next of kin's experience of powerlessness and helplessness in palliative home care.

Authors:  Anna Milberg; Peter Strang; Maria Jakobsson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  What "best practice" could be in Palliative Care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main Health Organizations.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Franco Toscani
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Family caregiver knowledge of treatment intent in a longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Catherine M Burns; Tracy Dixon; Dorothy Broom; Wayne T Smith; Paul S Craft
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The interactive effect of advanced cancer patient and caregiver prognostic understanding on patients' completion of Do Not Resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Megan Johnson Shen; Kelly M Trevino; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.