Literature DB >> 9232391

Assessment of parotid masses: which MR pulse sequences are optimal?

S Takashima1, S Sone, F Takayama, Y Maruyama, M Hasegawa, A Horii, J Yoshida.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to determine which MR pulse sequences are optimal for delineation of lesion and predicting pathologic nature of lesion with signal intensity. A prospective study was performed in 53 parotid masses (39 benign and 14 malignant lesions) in 53 patients. Signal intensity of lesion was visually assessed and lesion/parotid contrast-to-noise ratios were measured. On visual assessment, detection sensitivity was 100% for nonenhanced nonfat-suppressed T1-weighted images, 91% for nonfat-suppressed fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted images, 83% for gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, and 75% for fat-suppressed FSE T2-weighted images. The highest contrast-to-noise ratios were obtained with nonenhanced T1-weighted images. Hypointensity of lesion relative to the parotid gland on nonfat-suppressed FSE T2-weighted images was seen in 11 of 14 malignancies, 12 of 15 Warthin tumors, and two of 18 pleomorphic adenomas. Cystic portion of hyperintensity on nonenhanced T1-weighted images was solely seen in benign tumors (n = 11). Thus, the highest accuracy (81%) (79% sensitivity and 82% specificity) for predicting malignancy was obtained with a criterion of hypointensity on nonfat-suppressed FSE T2-weighted images plus absence of cystic portion of hyperintensity on nonenhanced T1-weighted images. Nonenhanced T1-weighted images combined with nonfat-suppressed FSE T2-weighted images is optimal for delineation of lesion and prediction of pathologic nature of parotid masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232391     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

1.  Space occupying lesions of parotid gland. Comparative diagnostic imaging and pathological analysis of echo color/power Doppler and of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L Izzo; A Casullo; M Caputo; U Costi; A Guerrisi; A Stasolla; L Basso; M Marini; G De Toma
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.124

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy.

Authors:  S Eida; M Sumi; N Sakihama; H Takahashi; T Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Neither MRI, CT nor US is superior to diagnose tumors in the salivary glands--an extended case study.

Authors:  Claudia Rudack; Sabine Jörg; Stephan Kloska; Wolfgang Stoll; Oliver Thiede
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.151

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.