Literature DB >> 9232047

Preferences of pregnant women and physicians for 2 strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates.

M Peralta-Carcelen1, C A Fargason, D Coston, J G Dolan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess preferences of pregnant women, pediatricians, and obstetricians for the policies of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for reducing the incidence of neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis.
DESIGN: An interactive interview using a computer-based decision-making model (analytic hierarchy process) and a self-administered survey assessing the interview process.
SETTING: An obstetric clinic at a university center and offices of practicing physicians from the Birmingham, Ala, area. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two pregnant women selected by a systematic sampling technique and 40 pediatricians and 40 obstetricians selected randomly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ranking of the ACOG and AAP policies and the 5 criteria on which the decision was based: risk of infection to an infant, knowledge of maternal GBS status, risk of anaphylaxis to mother, diagnostic tests received by healthy infants, and cost. Satisfaction with the interview process also was measured.
RESULTS: Eighty-three women (90%), 40 pediatricians, and 40 obstetricians (100%) provided responses suitable for analysis. Sixty-seven pregnant women (81%), 26 pediatricians (65%), and 6 obstetricians (15%) preferred the AAP strategy. The ACOG policy was the preferred strategy by 34 (85%) obstetricians. The 3 groups ranked risk of infection in an infant as the most important criterion in their decisions. Ranks for the other criteria differed among the 3 groups. Women ranked knowledge of maternal GBS status more important than did pediatricians and obstetricians. Thirty obstetricians (75%), 35 pediatricians (87.5%), and 72 pregnant women (86.7%) liked the interview. Seventy-three women (88%), 29 pediatricians (72.5%), and 17 obstetricians (42.5%) thought physicians should use this type of interview to assist in managing patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women, pediatricians, and obstetricians had different priorities when making a decision about GBS policies. These differences led obstetricians to prefer a different policy than that of pediatricians and pregnant women. Obstetricians were less likely to endorse the use of this decision-making technique in their practice than were patients and pediatricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232047     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170440074013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  6 in total

1.  The Feasibility of Sophisticated Multicriteria Support for Clinical Decisions.

Authors:  James G Dolan; Peter J Veazie
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  James G Dolan; Emily Boohaker; Jeroan Allison; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  James G Dolan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Involving patients in decisions regarding preventive health interventions using the analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  James G. Dolan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Shared decision-making--transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

Authors:  James G Dolan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-28

6.  Can Streamlined Multicriteria Decision Analysis Be Used to Implement Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Authors:  James G Dolan; Emily Boohaker; Jeroan Allison; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.583

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.