N Hughart1, P Vivier, A Ross, D Strobino, E Holt, W Hou, B Guyer. 1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. nhughart@phnet.sph.jhu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the beliefs of parents and the visit patterns of their children to determine whether immunizations act as an incentive to use well-child care. DESIGN AND METHODS: Medical record audits provided data on immunizations and well-child visits. Two questions from a parent interview were used to identify 4 groups of parents: (1) motivated and (2) unmotivated to keep a well-child care appointment regardless of whether immunizations are scheduled, (3) vaccine-motivated and (4) checkup-motivated (parents who were influenced negatively by the prospect of receiving vaccinations). The percentage of children with a visit at each age window for well-child visits and the percentage up-to-date for their immunizations at given ages were compared across the 4 groups. The 4 groups were also compared for other parental attitudes about immunizations and well-child visits, and on sociodemographic and access characteristics. RESULTS: Most (73.3%) of the 502 parents surveyed were classified as motivated and 5% as unmotivated to keep a well-child care appointment regardless of whether an immunization was scheduled. Only 18.3% were categorized as vaccine-motivated and 3.4% as checkup-motivated. For all 4 groups, there was no discernible difference in attendance between immunization and nonimmunization visits. Attendance in the windows for well-child visits and percentage of children up-to-date on immunizations declined with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: In this inner-city population, attendance patterns at visits did not support the incentive hypothesis. This finding should reassure clinicians that providing immunizations outside of regular well-child care visits will not necessarily decrease attendance at visits for well-child care.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the beliefs of parents and the visit patterns of their children to determine whether immunizations act as an incentive to use well-child care. DESIGN AND METHODS: Medical record audits provided data on immunizations and well-child visits. Two questions from a parent interview were used to identify 4 groups of parents: (1) motivated and (2) unmotivated to keep a well-child care appointment regardless of whether immunizations are scheduled, (3) vaccine-motivated and (4) checkup-motivated (parents who were influenced negatively by the prospect of receiving vaccinations). The percentage of children with a visit at each age window for well-child visits and the percentage up-to-date for their immunizations at given ages were compared across the 4 groups. The 4 groups were also compared for other parental attitudes about immunizations and well-child visits, and on sociodemographic and access characteristics. RESULTS: Most (73.3%) of the 502 parents surveyed were classified as motivated and 5% as unmotivated to keep a well-child care appointment regardless of whether an immunization was scheduled. Only 18.3% were categorized as vaccine-motivated and 3.4% as checkup-motivated. For all 4 groups, there was no discernible difference in attendance between immunization and nonimmunization visits. Attendance in the windows for well-child visits and percentage of children up-to-date on immunizations declined with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: In this inner-city population, attendance patterns at visits did not support the incentive hypothesis. This finding should reassure clinicians that providing immunizations outside of regular well-child care visits will not necessarily decrease attendance at visits for well-child care.
Authors: Alan P Kendal; Alwin Peterson; Claudine Manning; Fujie Xu; Loretta J Neville; Carol Hogue Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.308