Literature DB >> 9232017

Perception of ecological risk to water environments.

T L McDaniels1, L J Axelrod, N S Cavanagh, P Slovic.   

Abstract

This paper examines lay and expert perceptions of the ecological risks associated with a range of human activities that could adversely affect water resource environments. It employs the psychometric paradigm pioneered in characterizing perceptions of human health risks, which involves surveys to obtain judgments from subjects about risk items in terms of several important characteristics of the risks. The paper builds on a previous study that introduced ecological risk perception. This second study employs a larger, more diverse sample, a more focused topic area, and comparisons between lay and expert judgments. The results confirm that a small set of underlying factors explain a great deal of variability in lay judgments about ecological risks. These have been termed Ecological Impact, Human Benefits, Controllability, and Knowledge. The results are useful in explaining subjects' judgments of the general riskiness of, and need for regulation of, various risk items. The results also indicate several differences and areas of agreement among the lay and expert samples that point to potential key issues in future ecological risk management efforts for water resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9232017     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00872.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  13 in total

1.  Exploring public perception of non-native species from a visions of nature perspective.

Authors:  Laura N H Verbrugge; Riyan J G Van den Born; H J Rob Lenders
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in northern China.

Authors:  Harry F Lee; David D Zhang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bruch; Fred Feinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  Assessing environmental attitudes and concerns about a contaminated site in a densely populated suburban environment.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Symptomatology attributable to psychological exposure to a chemical incident: a natural experiment.

Authors:  John Gallacher; Karin Bronstering; Stephen Palmer; David Fone; Ronan Lyons
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Factors influencing acquisition of ecological and exposure information about hazards and risks from contaminated sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Greenberg; Michael Gochfeld; Sheila Shukla; Karen Lowrie; Roger Keren
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  The framing effect and skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Patrick Ring
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  A study of the perception of health risks among college students in China.

Authors:  Chenggang Zhang; Jingbo Fan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native invasive species: a quantitative investigation of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes.

Authors:  Anke Fischer; Sebastian Selge; René van der Wal; Brendon M H Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Health Risks Associated with Oil Pollution in the Niger Delta, Nigeria.

Authors:  Jerome Nriagu; Emilia A Udofia; Ibanga Ekong; Godwin Ebuk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.