Literature DB >> 9231115

Measuring knowledge and clinical reasoning skills in a problem-based curriculum.

H P Boshuizen1, C P van der Vleuten, H G Schmidt, M Machiels-Bongaerts.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the Progress Test that was specially designed for measuring the growth of knowledge and clinical reasoning skills in a problem-based medical curriculum. Scores and subscores of students from the different categories of the Progress Test were compared with their scores on a Clinical Reasoning Tests. Both the Progress Test and the Clinical Reasoning Test revealed the same pattern of increasing scores over the years, and had a high intercorrelation. Further analyses revealed that the clinical sciences subscore in the progress test explained the variations in the clinical reasoning test scores. The knowledge of the behavioural sciences subscore made a small but independent contribution. The knowledge of the biomedical sciences subscore did not have this independent effect. These outcomes are discussed in this paper from the perspective of development of medical expertise research and theory. Some educational consequences are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9231115     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

Review 1.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Authors:  Ralf Schmidmaier; Stephan Eiber; Rene Ebersbach; Miriam Schiller; Inga Hege; Matthias Holzer; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts.

Authors:  Sylvain P Coderre; Peter Harasym; Henry Mandin; Gordon Fick
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality.

Authors:  Syed Haris Ali; Kenneth G Ruit
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions.

Authors:  Elham Boushehri; Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Alireza Monajemi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Undergraduate curriculum in palliative medicine at Tampere University increases students' knowledge.

Authors:  Juho T Lehto; Kati Hakkarainen; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Tiina Saarto
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Sophie Fürstenberg; Viktor Oubaid; Pascal O Berberat; Martina Kadmon; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.