Literature DB >> 9230660

Lack of benefit of combined pancreaticosplenectomy in D2 resection for proximal-third gastric carcinoma.

Y Kodera1, Y Yamamura, Y Shimizu, A Torii, T Hirai, K Yasui, T Morimoto, T Kato, T Kito.   

Abstract

Of the 2790 patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent surgery between January 1978 and December 1993, there were 224 who underwent a D2 resection for cancer of the proximal third of the stomach. Survival in these patients was retrospectively analyzed with special reference to the survival benefit of pancreaticosplenectomy (PS). The D2 resection involved a splenectomy in 129 patients, a PS in 38 patients, and neither in 57 patients, with 5-year survivals of 74%, 59%, and 91%, respectively. Although these differences in survival were attributable to the apparent deviation in the incidence of prognostic variables, no significant survival benefit of PS was observed for patients with the same clinical stage disease (stages II and III) or the same modal status (n1 and n2). Because PS was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of anastomotic dehiscence and length of hospital stay, the dismal survival benefit implies that it should not be performed routinely with the D2 resection but should be employed only for lesions with direct invasion of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9230660     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  16 in total

1.  Appropriateness of splenectomy for advanced cancer located in the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Value of splenectomy in patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Hironobu Goto; Masanori Tokunaga; Norihiko Sugisawa; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masahiro Niihara; Yasuhiro Tsubosa; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Should we remove splenic hilus lymph nodes for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  H H Hartgrink
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Lymph node metastasis from cancer of the esophagogastric junction, and determination of the appropriate nodal dissection.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kakeji; Manabu Yamamoto; Shuhei Ito; Masahiko Sugiyama; Akinori Egashira; Hiroshi Saeki; Masaru Morita; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Yasushi Toh; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Surgical management of esophagogastric junction tumors.

Authors:  Burkhard H A von Rahden; Hubert J Stein; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Xin-Zu Chen; Jian-Kun Hu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Edwin P M Jansen; Nicole C T van Grieken; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  New metastatic lymph node ratio system reduces stage migration in patients undergoing D1 lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ugwuji N Maduekwe; Gregory Y Lauwers; Carlos Fernandez-Del-Castillo; David L Berger; Charles M Ferguson; David W Rattner; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer: chemotherapy versus radiation.

Authors:  Noman Ashraf; Sarah Hoffe; Richard Kim
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-08-21

10.  Rationale for gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alvaro Díaz de Liaño; Concepción Yarnoz; Rubén Aguilar; Cristina Artieda; Héctor Ortiz
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.