Literature DB >> 9230158

The AVID trial: evidence based or randomized control trials--is the AVID study too late? Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.

M E Josephson, S Nisam.   

Abstract

A great body of clinical evidence has been accumulated--before and without the AVID trial--showing that implantable defibrillators prolong life better than currently available antiarrhythmic drugs. With this evidence already available, we question the validity of a trial that attempted, in effect, to place a price tag on life and quality of life.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9230158     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study: what does it mean after the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial?

Authors:  V A Subramanian; N U Patel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Evidence-based medicine and the implantable defibrillator.

Authors:  R N Fogoros
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  The conundrum of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy: which abnormality came first?

Authors:  Mishi Bhushan; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-03

4.  Safe introduction and quality control of new methods in coronary surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Bergsland
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2011-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.