Literature DB >> 9228844

Corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel.

J A Platt1, A Guzman, A Zuccari, D W Thornburg, B F Rhodes, Y Oshida, B K Moore.   

Abstract

The corrosion of 2205 duplex stainless steel was compared with that of AISI type 316L stainless steel. The 2205 stainless steel is a potential orthodontic bracket material with low nickel content (4 to 6 wt%), whereas the 316L stainless steel (nickel content: 10 to 14 wt%) is a currently used bracket material. Both stainless steels were subjected to electrochemical and immersion (crevice) corrosion tests in 37 degrees C, 0.9 wt% sodium chloride solution. Electrochemical testing indicates that 2205 has a longer passivation range than 316L. The corrosion rate of 2205 was 0.416 MPY (milli-inch per year), whereas 316L exhibited 0.647 MPY. When 2205 was coupled to 316L with equal surface area ratio, the corrosion rate of 2205 reduced to 0.260 MPY, indicating that 316L stainless steel behaved like a sacrificial anode. When 316L is coupled with NiTi, TMA, or stainless steel arch wire and was subjected to the immersion corrosion test, it was found that 316L suffered from crevice corrosion. On the other hand, 2205 stainless steel did not show any localized crevice corrosion, although the surface of 2205 was covered with corrosion products, formed when coupled to NiTi and stainless steel wires. This study indicates that considering corrosion resistance, 2205 duplex stainless steel is an improved alternative to 316L for orthodontic bracket fabrication when used in conjunction with titanium, its alloys, or stainless steel arch wires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9228844     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70276-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Magnetizable stent-grafts enable endothelial cell capture.

Authors:  Brandon J Tefft; Susheil Uthamaraj; J Jonathan Harburn; Ota Hlinomaz; Amir Lerman; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Gurpreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Nickel and chromium levels in the saliva of a Saudi sample treated with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Nabeel F Talic; Hasan H Alnahwi; Ali S Al-Faraj
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-10-19

3.  Galvanic Corrosion of and Ion Release from Various Orthodontic Brackets and Wires in a Fluoride-containing Mouthwash.

Authors:  Soodeh Tahmasbi; Mohammad Ghorbani; Mahdis Masudrad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  Corrosion resistance of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium molybdenum alloy, and ion-implanted titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in acidic fluoride-containing artificial saliva: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Venith Jojee Pulikkottil; S Chidambaram; P U Bejoy; P K Femin; Parson Paul; Mohamed Rishad
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

5.  The biogeochemical fate of nickel during microbial ISA degradation; implications for nuclear waste disposal.

Authors:  Gina Kuippers; Christopher Boothman; Heath Bagshaw; Michael Ward; Rebecca Beard; Nicholas Bryan; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Nanomaterials Application in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Wojciech Zakrzewski; Maciej Dobrzynski; Wojciech Dobrzynski; Anna Zawadzka-Knefel; Mateusz Janecki; Karolina Kurek; Adam Lubojanski; Maria Szymonowicz; Zbigniew Rybak; Rafal J Wiglusz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Effect of pH on in vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Angela Galeotti; Roberto Uomo; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Sergio Paduano; Roberta Cimino; Rosa Valletta; Vincenzo D'Antò
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.