Literature DB >> 9228612

Finding genes in DNA with a Hidden Markov Model.

J Henderson1, S Salzberg, K H Fasman.   

Abstract

This study describes a new Hidden Markov Model (HMM) system for segmenting uncharacterized genomic DNA sequences into exons, introns, and intergenic regions. Separate HMM modules were designed and trained for specific regions of DNA: exons, introns, intergenic regions, and splice sites. The models were then tied together to form a biologically feasible topology. The integrated HMM was trained further on a set of eukaryotic DNA sequences and tested by using it to segment a separate set of sequences. The resulting HMM system which is called VEIL (Viterbi Exon-Intron Locator), obtains an overall accuracy on test data of 92% of total bases correctly labelled, with a correlation coefficient of 0.73. Using the more stringent test of exact exon prediction, VEIL correctly located both ends of 53% of the coding exons, and 49% of the exons it predicts are exactly correct. These results compare favorably to the best previous results for gene structure prediction and demonstrate the benefits of using HMMs for this problem.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9228612     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.1997.4.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  31 in total

1.  Mining Bacillus subtilis chromosome heterogeneities using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Pierre Nicolas; Laurent Bize; Florence Muri; Mark Hoebeke; François Rodolphe; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bernard Prum; Philippe Bessières
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  GlimmerM, Exonomy and Unveil: three ab initio eukaryotic genefinders.

Authors:  William H Majoros; Mihaela Pertea; Corina Antonescu; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Catherine Mathé; Marie-France Sagot; Thomas Schiex; Pierre Rouzé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Evaluating bacterial gene-finding HMM structures as probabilistic logic programs.

Authors:  Søren Mørk; Ian Holmes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  A markovian approach for the prediction of mouse isochores.

Authors:  Christelle Melodelima; Christian Gautier; Didier Piau
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding.

Authors:  A V Lukashin; M Borodovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Using database matches with for HMMGene for automated gene detection in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Krogh
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Regional effects on chimera formation in 454 pyrosequenced amplicons from a mock community.

Authors:  Sunguk Shin; Tae Kwon Lee; Jung Min Han; Joonhong Park
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Interkingdom Gut Microbiome and Resistome of the Cockroach Blattella germanica.

Authors:  Rebeca Domínguez-Santos; Ana Elena Pérez-Cobas; Paolo Cuti; Vicente Pérez-Brocal; Carlos García-Ferris; Andrés Moya; Amparo Latorre; Rosario Gil
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  Comparative annotation of functional regions in the human genome using epigenomic data.

Authors:  Kyoung-Jae Won; Xian Zhang; Tao Wang; Bo Ding; Debasish Raha; Michael Snyder; Bing Ren; Wei Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.