Literature DB >> 9226311

Neon heavy charged particle radiotherapy of glioblastoma of the brain.

J R Castro1, T L Phillips, M Prados, P Gutin, D A Larson, P L Petti, I K Daftari, J M Collier, P Lillis-Hearne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation beams have potential applications in the treatment of glioblastoma, but have not yet demonstrated significant improvement in results. However, some patients have had local control of glioblastoma with high-LET irradiations such as neutrons and heavy charged particles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this collaborative study, 15 patients were entered into a randomized protocol comparing two dose levels of 20 and 25 Gy in 4 weeks of neon ion irradiation. This trial was intended to determine the optimal neon dose in terms of survival and effects of radiation.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were evaluable with no significant differences in median survival (13 and 14 months; p = NS) or median time to failure (7 and 9 months; p = NS) between the two dose arms. Three patients died of nontumor-related causes, of whom one (who died 19 months posttreatment) had autopsy confirmation of no tumor on pathological exam. The other two patients had stable magnetic resonance imaging scans at 6 and 22 months posttreatment.
CONCLUSION: Although the results did not demonstrate the optimal high-LET dose level, there is an intriguing effect in that two patients had control of glioblastoma until death at 19 and 22 months. This suggests that better conformation of the high-LET dose to the tumor with neutron capture therapy or dynamic conformal heavy charged particle therapy might control glioblastoma while minimizing brain damage from radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9226311     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00039-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

Review 1.  Common challenges and problems in clinical trials of boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumors.

Authors:  N Gupta; R A Gahbauer; T E Blue; B Albertson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  [Malignant gliomas--radiotherapy].

Authors:  Annemarie Schratter-Sehn
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Physical advantages of particles: protons and light ions.

Authors:  Oliver Jäkel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Survival in glioblastoma: a review on the impact of treatment modalities.

Authors:  P D Delgado-López; E M Corrales-García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Clinical review of the Japanese experience with boron neutron capture therapy and a proposed strategy using epithermal neutron beams.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nakagawa; Kyonghon Pooh; Toru Kobayashi; Teruyoshi Kageji; Shinichi Uyama; Akira Matsumura; Hiroaki Kumada
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The United States needs at least one carbon ion facility.

Authors:  Eleanor A Blakely; Bruce Faddegon; Christopher Tinkle; Charles Bloch; Michael Dominello; Robert J Griffin; Michael C Joiner; Jay Burmeister
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.