Literature DB >> 9225416

Head injury rehabilitation in the U.K.: an economic perspective.

K McGregor1, B Pentland.   

Abstract

The human and societal costs as a result of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are extensive with approximately 200-300/100,000 of the population requiring hospitalisation each year in the U.K. Advances in neurosurgical management have meant that more people sustaining head injuries are surviving. The need for rehabilitation programmes for these individuals is therefore ever increasing. While in the U.S.A. rehabilitation programmes for TBI patients are well established, in the U.K. the provision of such services is patchy and varies widely in different localities. The belated response to the rehabilitation needs of this group of individuals in the U.K. has coincided with an increased awareness of the economic efficiency of health care provision. This paper critically reviews published studies looking at the economics of rehabilitation services for brain injured patients. No studies in the U.K. were identified and all the sources discussed are from the U.S.A. The methodological guidelines underlying economic appraisal of health care are summarised and the studies assessed to determine the extent to which they fulfil these guidelines. The paper concludes that most studies purporting to provide evidence of cost-effectiveness did not include appropriate data, nor followed the methodological guidelines allowing such claims to be made. Some recommendations for future research are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9225416     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00345-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis.

Authors:  C A Hawley; R Taylor; D J Hellawell; B Pentland
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Working and learning together: good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?

Authors:  K McPherson; L Headrick; F Moss
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

3.  Brain Trauma Mortality Rate Score Scale (BTMRSS): Postmortem Evaluation of the Events.

Authors:  Alexandrina Nikova; Ivaylo Dimitrov
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-06-19

4.  The costs of traumatic brain injury: a literature review.

Authors:  Ioan Humphreys; Rodger L Wood; Ceri J Phillips; Steven Macey
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-06-26

5.  Traumatic brain injury in the Netherlands: incidence, costs and disability-adjusted life years.

Authors:  Annemieke C Scholten; Juanita A Haagsma; Martien J M Panneman; Ed F van Beeck; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adult growth hormone deficiency - benefits, side effects, and risks of growth hormone replacement.

Authors:  Mary L Reed; George R Merriam; Atil Y Kargi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  The clinical and cost-benefits of investing in neurobehavioural rehabilitation: a multi-centre study.

Authors:  Michael Oddy; Sara da Silva Ramos
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The costs of traumatic head injury and associated factors at University of Gondar Specialized Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yilak Asmamaw; Mezgebu Yitayal; Ayal Debie; Simegnew Handebo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Exosomal microRNA Differential Expression in Plasma of Young Adults with Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Healthy Control.

Authors:  Rany Vorn; Maiko Suarez; Jacob C White; Carina A Martin; Hyung-Suk Kim; Chen Lai; Si-Jung Yun; Jessica M Gill; Hyunhwa Lee
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.