Literature DB >> 9224665

Interpretation of bone densitometry studies.

G M Blake1, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used for identifying patients with osteoporosis, making decisions about the commencement of preventive therapy, and following up response to treatment. It is important that radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians issuing clinical reports present clear interpretations that aid the primary care physician in making decisions affecting treatment. This review discusses the principles behind the interpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) studies. After a World Health Organization report published in 1994, osteoporosis is often diagnosed on the basis of the patient's T-score value (difference of BMD from young adult mean normalized to the population SD). T-scores are a measure of current fracture risk. There are problems relating to the use of T-scores in the elderly, and we argue that decisions about treatment are generally best made on the basis of the Z-score value (difference of BMD from age-matched mean normalized to the population SD) because this measures the patient's fracture risk relative to his or her peers. Recent studies confirm that the posteroanterior (PA) projection lumbar spine scan is still the optimum measurement site for monitoring response to treatment. A BMD change of 4.5% is required to register a statistically significant change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224665     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(97)80027-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  9 in total

1.  Timing of follow-up densitometry in hormone replacement therapy users for optimal osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; L Del Rio; J Rosales; X Nogués; J Vila; R Carreras
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  An approach to the patient with osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Mumtaz
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2001-01

3.  Bone Mineral Density in Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Ganesh Choudhary; Raj Kumar Gupta; Jaiveer Beniwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Joseph C H Wong; Louise McEwan; Naomi Lee; Matthew R Griffiths; Nicholas A Pocock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Evaluation of bone remodeling with (18)F-fluoride and correlation with the glucose metabolism measured by (18)F-FDG in lumbar spine with time in an experimental nude rat model with osteoporosis using dynamic PET-CT.

Authors:  Caixia Cheng; Christian Heiss; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; P Govindarajan; G Schlewitz; Leyun Pan; Reinhard Schnettler; Klaus Weber; Ludwig G Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-03-08

6.  Influence of compliance on bone mineral density changes in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer on Anastrozole.

Authors:  Matthias Kalder; Volker Ziller; Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Dana Knöll; Olaf Hars; Peyman Hadji
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  An evaluation of the United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Society position statement on the use of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Rajesh Patel; Glen M Blake; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  ALDH2 polymorphisms and bone mineral density in an elderly Japanese population.

Authors:  J Yamaguchi; Y Hasegawa; M Kawasaki; T Masui; T Kanoh; N Ishiguro; N Hamajima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Automatic Estimation of Osteoporotic Fracture Cases by Using Ensemble Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Niyazi Kilic; Erkan Hosgormez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.460

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.