Literature DB >> 9224048

Grounded theory method, Part I: Within the five moments of qualitative research.

M Annells1.   

Abstract

While discussing how the grounded theory method has been situated during the five moments of qualitative research history, a detailed analysis is offered of the differences between the classic mode of the method and Strauss and Corbin's reformulation of the method. Such differences include: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, intended product, theoretical underpinnings, procedural steps and claims of rigour. Reasons for Strauss and Corbin's elaboration of the method are suggested, within an historical context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224048     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Inq        ISSN: 1320-7881            Impact factor:   2.393


  6 in total

Review 1.  Generating or developing grounded theory: methods to understand health and illness.

Authors:  Phillip Woods; Rod Gapp; Michelle A King
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-02-25

2.  Mindfulness and motivational interviewing: two candidate methods for promoting self-management.

Authors:  Roberto P Benzo
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.444

3.  Discriminating among grounded theory approaches.

Authors:  Kendra L Rieger
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 2.393

4.  Systematic care for caregivers of people with dementia in the ambulatory mental health service: designing a multicentre, cluster, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Anouk Spijker; Frans Verhey; Maud Graff; Richard Grol; Eddy Adang; Hub Wollersheim; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Disparity in health care: HIV, stigma, and marginalization in Nepal.

Authors:  Chandra K Jha; Jeanne Madison
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Opportunities for Increased Physical Activity in the Workplace: the Walking Meeting (WaM) Pilot Study, Miami, 2015.

Authors:  Hannah E Kling; Xuan Yang; Sarah E Messiah; Kristopher L Arheart; Debi Brannan; Alberto J Caban-Martinez
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.830

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.